Bug 2129584
Summary: | Review Request: rubygem-rexml - An XML toolkit for Ruby | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Robby Callicotte <rcallicotte> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | package-review, vondruch |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2022-10-02 04:05:19 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Robby Callicotte
2022-09-25 05:48:06 UTC
Dear Robby, Unless you have specific needs, I'd suggest against introducing rubygem-rexml package into Fedora, because we actually have it in Fedora already, as a subpackage of Ruby: ~~~ $ sudo dnf info rubygem-rexml Last metadata expiration check: 0:52:33 ago on Mon Sep 26 08:50:15 2022. Installed Packages Name : rubygem-rexml Version : 3.2.5 Release : 169.fc38 Architecture : noarch Size : 399 k Source : ruby-3.1.2-169.fc38.src.rpm Repository : @System From repo : rawhide Summary : An XML toolkit for Ruby URL : https://github.com/ruby/rexml License : BSD Description : REXML was inspired by the Electric XML library for Java, which features an : easy-to-use API, small size, and speed. Hopefully, REXML, designed with the same : philosophy, has these same features. I've tried to keep the API as intuitive as : possible, and have followed the Ruby methodology for method naming and code : flow, rather than mirroring the Java API. : : REXML supports both tree and stream document parsing. Stream parsing is faster : (about 1.5 times as fast). However, with stream parsing, you don't get access to : features such as XPath. ~~~ |