Bug 213194
Summary: | FC-6-i386-DVD.iso not recognized | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Chris Miller <chris> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Chris Lumens <clumens> |
Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 6 | CC: | ncunning |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-05-30 21:41:40 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Chris Miller
2006-10-31 05:10:06 UTC
I wanted to add a bit more information: I downloaded boot.iso, burned it to CD and used that for the installation. So, the deficiency I mention is in boot.iso. There are a couple similar error messages that can be displayed when anaconda gets confused about images. Which one are you seeing? Also do you have both the DVD and the CD images in the same directory? Where did you get the DVD image? Apparently, I have given you a confused set of circumstances. I downloaded boot.iso and burned it to CD. I downloaded FC-6-i386-disc[12345].iso and put them in an exported directory. I booted the CD and I installed with “method=nfs:10.1.2.11:/fedora” The installation worked with no problem. Later, I moved FC-6-i386-disc[12345].iso some place safe and out of the way. I downloaded FC-6-i386-DVD.iso and I put it in that same exported directory. Again, I booted the CD and I installed with “method=nfs:10.1.2.11:/fedora” The message was something like, “That directory does not contain a fedora installation tree” I can’t be precisely certain about the wording nor the case, but that is quite close. I will be installing another machine next week, and I will repeat this experiment and note the precise error message. I’d be willing to do the ground work to find out what is happening. Would an erthereal trace be helpful? If not, then I won’t bother, but if you think it can help you, then I’m happy to do it. Noe more note: I downloaded everything from download.fedora.redhat.com/... Hm, I wasn't able to reproduce this on ppc with a quick test. I know the error message you are referring to now, so don't worry about getting the exact wording. When this error pops up, can you switch to tty3 and attach a picture of what messages you see on that console? I don't think ethereal will show anything too helpful here, but feel free to play around with it and see if you get anything useful. This is a headless server, so I have no consoles to view. If there are kernel boot parameters that might help you, I will set them at your request. If there is a way to capture what you want, I can do that also, but not with attachen KVM. If you want me to try some experiments, I can. If you tell me what boot.iso uses to recognize a valid Fedora installation tree, I will be glad to check to see what I have and hack things to see what I can do and report these findings to you. For example, is the filename important (I wouldn’t expect so) ? What file in the file system does boot.iso want and what needs to be in it? I suspect this is a trivial mis-configuration and I also suspect that it is limited to the i386 class. I can’t guess if boot.iso is (incorrectly) failing to recognize the DVD or if boot.iso is (correctly) ignoring an incorrectly labeled DVD. I suspect that the DVD is not correctly labeled because boot.iso had no problem with the five disc set. At this stage in anaconda, there's not really any good way to capture these messages except having a monitor and keyboard attached. Is it at all possible for you to hook something up and take a look? Once anaconda gets past the loader, we have network syslog capabilities to make this easier but you are still too early to be able to do that. I also suspect it is something really simple. I expect the log files to tell us exactly what is going on. This code is a bit of a mess so simply stepping through it is a little difficult until I see which of the many branches your machine is taking. Would it be possible for you to start off trying this install method so we get the error messages logged, then go back and select a different installation method that will allow you to progress to the second stage? Then you should be able to drop into a shell and grab the logs. I will be happy to do this. Please tell me which logs you think I should be able to find and where they will be. I will collect everything you need at any step in the process that you think will be helpful. I’m asking for specific advice about the logs because I am not aware of any logs except the anaconda-ks.cfg, install.log and install.log.syslog and they are collected only after the distribution has been mounted and the package installation can begin. So that means long after this particular problem has been resolved. /tmp/anaconda.log and /tmp/syslog would be the most important ones. We append to those as we go along, and they get copied over to the installed system after installation is complete. I am not going to complete the installation. So, after my installation tree has been rejected, and I am still at the console, how do I fetch the logs you mention? I don’t know how to get to a shell at that point. You're doing a serial console test mode install, yeah? Just try and fail with the DVD method, pick a new method that will work, and allow anaconda to get up to the "Welcome to Fedora Core!" screen. Once that comes up, ctrl-z should suspend the installer. You can then grab /tmp/install.log and /tmp/syslog and either scp them to another machine you have access to or copy them to a floppy or other such drive. No need to go any further in the installation than that. Smokin'! I'll have these for you in a bit... Any news on this bug report? |