Bug 2132697

Summary: [RFE] 389ds: run as non-root [rhel-9.2.0]
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Reporter: RHEL Program Management Team <pgm-rhel-tools>
Component: 389-ds-baseAssignee: Pierre Rogier <progier>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: LDAP QA Team <idm-ds-qe-bugs>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 9.0CC: arajendr, bsmejkal, idm-ds-dev-bugs, mreynolds, pasik, pcech, progier, pvlasin, radrao, sgouvern, spichugi, tbordaz, vashirov
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release: 9.2   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 389-ds-base-2.2.4-3.el9 Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Feature: Simplify instance creation and administration by non root user Reason: Such configuration is useful for tests and was not documented. Result: A new dscreate subcommand has been added: It may be used by non root users and generates a prefixed installation. See: dscreate ds-root --help for details Limitations: - This feature requires that packages get previously installed as root (by using: dnf install 389-ds-base) - selinux is not handled (But as we are running as an user in a file system directory owned by the user, this should not be an issue) - Rust plugins are disabled. - snmp is not supported.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1872451 Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-05-09 07:41:32 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1872451    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2023-05-09 07:41:32 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (389-ds-base bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:2274