Bug 2135363
| Summary: | The multiple VM creation via templates fail with error ` nova.exception.VirtualInterfaceCreateException: Virtual Interface creation failed` | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Shailesh Chhabdiya <schhabdi> |
| Component: | openstack-neutron | Assignee: | Slawek Kaplonski <skaplons> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Eran Kuris <ekuris> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | urgent | ||
| Version: | 16.2 (Train) | CC: | averdagu, bshephar, chrisw, ekuris, jlibosva, mtomaska, ralonsoh, rdiwakar, scohen, skaplons |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-06-29 06:11:10 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Shailesh Chhabdiya
2022-10-17 11:37:02 UTC
To summarise my understanding here. From Cisco's perspective, it seems their investigation shows that the port was configured, added to the DB and then we reached this point at which a message should have been published on the Message bus (RabbitMQ): https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/stable/train/neutron/db/provisioning_blocks.py#L140-L145 Which is done by neutron-lib: https://github.com/openstack/neutron-lib/blob/stable/train/neutron_lib/callbacks/registry.py#L59-L60 So assuming that all worked up until that point, then there could have been some issue with RabbitMQ during that time that prevented the message being published or received by Nova. Can you verify if there are any RabbitMQ issues seen during the time of the error? Last time this issue come up, I called out errors that were seen with RMQ as well. So it could be the case here too: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082009#c4 Adding in PIDONE as FYI if we need to go down the RMQ route. |