Bug 213555

Summary:	Missing /usr/lib/librtkaio.so and /usr/lib/librt.so.1
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>
Component:	glibc	Assignee:	Jakub Jelinek <jakub>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	chkr, michal, rtc
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	2.5.90-4	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-11-05 01:25:25 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Robert Scheck 2006-11-01 22:47:00 UTC

Description of problem:
$ rpm -V glibc-devel
Unsatisfied dependencies for glibc-devel-2.5.90-3.i386:
/usr/lib/librtkaio.so

missing     /usr/lib/librt.so.1
$

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
glibc-devel-2.5.90-3

How reproducible:
After normal installation of glibc, I'm getting the result listed above.

Actual results:
Missing /usr/lib/librtkaio.so and /usr/lib/librt.so.1

Expected results:
rpm -V with no output.

Additional info:
Ah, if I force a re-installation of glibc-devel using --force, /usr/lib/librt.
so.1 is available until the next glibc update...

Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2006-11-01 23:09:49 UTC

$ rpm -q --scripts glibc-devel
postinstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh):
/sbin/install-info /usr/share/info/libc.info.gz /usr/share/info/dir
preuninstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh):
if [ "$1" = 0 ]; then
    /sbin/install-info --delete /usr/share/info/libc.info.gz /usr/share/info/dir
fi
$

And where's running ldconfig? /usr/lib/librt.so is in glibc-devel and packages 
that install libraries should run ldconfig.

Ah and missing /usr/lib/librtkaio.so is caused by this broken symbolic link:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 52128 Okt 30 14:39 /usr/lib/librt.a
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    20 Okt 30 14:11 /usr/lib/librt.so -> ../../lib/librt.
so.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    12 Okt 30 14:12 /usr/lib/librt.so.1 -> librtkaio.so

librt.so.1 -> librtkaio.so - Why? librtkaio.so doesn't exist in /usr/lib

Comment 2 Robert Scheck 2006-11-05 01:25:25 UTC

Fixed and verified in Rawhide, thanks. BTW, this packaging issue was detected 
using RPM 4.4.8 - just to show, that it's very useful even when Red Hat tries
to keep the very old 4.4.2...

Comment 3 Jakub Jelinek 2006-11-20 18:48:13 UTC

*** Bug 216476 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Jakub Jelinek 2006-11-26 22:26:03 UTC

*** Bug 217307 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Jakub Jelinek 2007-01-02 22:45:14 UTC

*** Bug 221049 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Christian Krause 2007-01-02 23:00:35 UTC

Hi Jakub,

I'm not 100% familiar with Fedora's policy, so I have to ask:
Will this fix be ported to FC6, too? ;-) (would be helpful to get also FC6
consistent...)

Thanks,
Christian