Bug 2135872

Summary: Add Libabigail to CodeReady Builder for RHEL 9.2
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Reporter: Dodji Seketeli <dodji>
Component: libabigailAssignee: Dodji Seketeli <dodji>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Michal Kolar <mkolar>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 9.2CC: fche, mcermak, sipoyare, wcohen
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---Flags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: libabigail-2.1-2.el9 Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-05-09 08:26:46 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Deadline: 2022-12-05   

Description Dodji Seketeli 2022-10-18 15:47:29 UTC
Libabigail has been a buildroot-only package since RHEL 8.

With the new RHEL 9 development process, the work required to keep it up to date in a buildroot-only package is equivalent to the work required to have it be in CRB, giving users of both centos-stream and RHEL9 access to this package without having to resort to Fedora EPEL.  It's thus a win for our customers at equivalent cost for us.

Comment 1 William Cohen 2022-10-21 17:04:09 UTC
Currently Dodji is planning on a NVR bump and rebuild for the CRB libabigail, so marking as "No doc update".  If there turns out to be patches to fix bugs, will revise to "Bug Fix"

Comment 3 Michal Kolar 2022-11-23 13:58:06 UTC
Verified with libabigail-2.1-2.el9.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2023-05-09 08:26:46 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (libabigail bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:2590