Bug 2136855

Summary: Please branch and build nss-pam-ldapd in epel9
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Davide Cavalca <davide>
Component: nss-pam-ldapdAssignee: Andre Boscatto <aboscatt>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: abokovoy, aboscatt, afarley, atikhono, carl, jhrozek, jwboyer, lslebodn, mkosek, nalin, pasik, thalman
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: nss-pam-ldapd-0.9.10-11.el9 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-11-22 15:03:17 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1914423    

Description Davide Cavalca 2022-10-21 15:53:59 UTC
Please branch and build nss-pam-ldapd in epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain nss-pam-ldapd in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nss-pam-ldapd/addgroup
and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.

Comment 1 Davide Cavalca 2022-10-30 17:00:46 UTC
Will you be able to branch and build nss-pam-ldapd in epel9?
The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer
if you do not wish to build it on epel9.

Comment 2 Andre Boscatto 2022-10-31 16:23:03 UTC
Hi Davide,

We are discussing it internally with some areas, I hope I will get an answer soon :)

Kind regards

Comment 9 Tomas Halman 2022-11-09 16:36:15 UTC
We do not intent to maintain nss-pam-ldapd any more. The main reason is that we have SSSD in the distribution and it provides the same functionality.

I suggest to transfer the ownership, as requested.

Comment 10 Davide Cavalca 2022-11-18 03:07:30 UTC
Any update on this?

Comment 11 Tomas Halman 2022-11-22 15:03:17 UTC
epel-packagers-sig has been added as collaborator, Access granted for epel* branches

Tomas

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2022-11-24 23:56:35 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4793416306 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4793416306

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2022-11-25 01:13:12 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4793416306 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4793416306

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2022-12-03 02:13:55 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4793416306 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.