Bug 2138009

Summary:	Please branch and build libsignal-protocol-c in epel9
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Matthieu Saulnier <msaulnier>
Component:	libsignal-protocol-c	Assignee:	Matthieu Saulnier <msaulnier>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	randy
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	libsignal-protocol-c-2.3.3-7.el9	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-11-11 01:29:03 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Matthieu Saulnier 2022-10-26 20:53:44 UTC

Please branch and build libsignal-protocol-c in epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain libsignal-protocol-c in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package (FAS fantom);
please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libsignal-protocol-c/adduser

The libsignal-protocol-c package is required for Profanity.

Comment 1 Randy Barlow 2022-11-02 14:56:43 UTC

Hello Matthieu!

I don't use this software on EL, and I think it would be best if the packager were someone who did, so I added you as a co-admin on the package with me. Besides, open source is better with friends ☺

Sorry it took some days to get to this ticket - I was traveling.

Comment 2 Matthieu Saulnier 2022-11-02 19:23:12 UTC

(In reply to Randy Barlow from comment #1)
> Hello Matthieu!
> 
> I don't use this software on EL, and I think it would be best if the
> packager were someone who did, so I added you as a co-admin on the package
> with me. Besides, open source is better with friends ☺
> 
> Sorry it took some days to get to this ticket - I was traveling.

Hi Randy, no worries

I started the process.

Thanks!

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2022-11-02 21:06:40 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-15ae9c9cbe has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-15ae9c9cbe

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2022-11-03 16:50:39 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-15ae9c9cbe has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-15ae9c9cbe

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2022-11-11 01:29:03 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-15ae9c9cbe has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.