Bug 2138273
| Summary: | [UI] Storage system hyperlink under status card on ODF Overview page is missing | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation | Reporter: | Aman Agrawal <amagrawa> |
| Component: | ceph-monitoring | Assignee: | arun kumar mohan <amohan> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Parag Kamble <pakamble> |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 4.10 | CC: | amohan, badhikar, dosypenk, ebenahar, jefbrown, muagarwa, nthomas, ocs-bugs, odf-bz-bot, sanjuak, skatiyar |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Regression, Reopened |
| Target Release: | ODF 4.12.0 | Flags: | dosypenk:
needinfo?
(sanjuak) |
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 4.12.0-114 | Doc Type: | No Doc Update |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-02-08 14:06:28 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 2142763, 2142787 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 2022356 | ||
|
Comment 5
Mudit Agarwal
2022-10-31 14:54:17 UTC
(In reply to Mudit Agarwal from comment #5) > Arun, is this expected or this is a bug? > If it is expected then what is the impact (on QE, Doc, customer etc.) Yes Mudit. This is a bug, we should be showing all the Storage Systems available (Ceph or IBM or MCG etc). @Sanjal, you have mentioned that `UI cannot use a different query`. Is it possible for us to use multiple queries (in the UI) and get all the results (instead of a single query)? If that is not possible then we have to device a single query or change the existing `odf_system_health_status` query to support all the Storage Systems. (In reply to arun kumar mohan from comment #9) > (In reply to Mudit Agarwal from comment #5) > > Arun, is this expected or this is a bug? > > If it is expected then what is the impact (on QE, Doc, customer etc.) > > Yes Mudit. This is a bug, we should be showing all the Storage Systems > available (Ceph or IBM or MCG etc). > > @Sanjal, you have mentioned that `UI cannot use a different query`. Is it > possible for us to use multiple queries (in the UI) and get all the results > (instead of a single query)? > > If that is not possible then we have to device a single query or change the > existing `odf_system_health_status` query to support all the Storage Systems. Hi Arun, UI uses generic metric/query which will work for all type of StorageSystems (internal/external/mcg-standalone/ibm-flashsystem/<any_new_maybe_in_future>). Ideally we shouldn't be making any UI change as we are using same metric/query since beginning unless it is not a monitoring/backend bug and are deliberate changes (if these are intentional changes from the backend it sounds strange that these changes were made without prior info that too after feature freeze:/ ) In case it is something that can not be fixed from backend then we need to make sure (we can discuss offline in a call as well): 1) Whatever metric we use is generic as well (for example: we can't use ceph_health_status as it will not work for mcg-standalone storagesystem). 2) We might have to backport the changes to earlier releases as well, depending upon upto which versions are affect. But that is just my take, tagging @badhikar as well to keep him in loop and in case I missed anything. We cannot change queries in the dashboard to accommodate any storage system. Storage Systems must report metrics as per the agreed upon convention. We cannot change queries in the dashboard to accommodate any storage system. Storage Systems must report metrics as per the agreed upon convention. Closing this issue as 'WORKS-FOR-ME'. from conversation with @skatiyar and @muagarwa appears that the bug fix for 4.10 depends on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142787 which on 23/11/22 is being under development. Even though bug fix for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142763 is on verification we still need to wait pr merged for 2142787, in order to verify and close this issue |