Bug 2138974
| Summary: | [RFE] Please re-run the storage tests to obtain both sequential and random read and write tests | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Jessica Richards <jrichards2> |
| Component: | Pulp | Assignee: | satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Satellite QE Team <sat-qe-bz-list> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.9.9 | CC: | ahumbe, dalley |
| Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | Unused | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-07-17 17:59:03 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jessica Richards
2022-10-31 20:04:21 UTC
Are we sure this isn't (effectively) a duplicate of one of the various migration performance BZs open such as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038995 or https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055336? What I was getting at is: * This user had problems with migrating from Satellite 6.9.9 to 6.10 taking a long time * This discussion about read/write speeds was focusing on the system requirements for a migration and whether their system was sufficient rather than performance issues in the migration process * But we know that there was at least known issue with 6.9.9 that was fixed in 6.9.10 - which was an unoptimized query which caused migrations to take days longer than expected https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038995 So the disk speeds are not necessarily relevant to the issue they were experiencing As mentioned, I believe the most likely cause for the root issue here was a query performance issue resolved in 6.9.10 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2038995 *** |