Bug 2141723

Summary:	[DDF] It'd be better to avoid stating that all persistent volumes can be statically provisioned in OpenShift. For
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation	Reporter:	Direct Docs Feedback <ddf-bot>
Component:	documentation	Assignee:	Anjana Suparna Sriram <asriram>
Status:	NEW ---	QA Contact:	Neha Berry <nberry>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	4.11	CC:	edonnell, odf-bz-bot, vfarias
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	NoDocsQEReview
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Direct Docs Feedback 2022-11-10 15:56:19 UTC

It'd be better to avoid stating that all persistent volumes can be statically provisioned in OpenShift. For example, at the time this is being raised, ODF itself doesn't support static provisioning.

One suggestion below: 

Storage plug-ins may support static provisioning, dynamic provisioning or both provisioning types.

Reported by: vagnerfarias

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openshift_data_foundation/4.11/html/managing_and_allocating_storage_resources/managing-persistent-volume-claims_rhodf#annotations:f68dea98-73f7-41db-b87a-54300fd3ee5d