Bug 2142462

Summary: Value of all the Fields (like Raw Capacity etc.) in Storagesystem page shows 0
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation Reporter: Aaruni Aggarwal <aaaggarw>
Component: ceph-monitoringAssignee: arun kumar mohan <amohan>
Status: ON_QA --- QA Contact: Harish NV Rao <hnallurv>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 4.12CC: amohan, branto, jefbrown, kramdoss, muagarwa, nthomas, odf-bz-bot, rcyriac, skatiyar
Target Milestone: ---Flags: skatiyar: needinfo? (amohan)
Target Release: ODF 4.14.0   
Hardware: ppc64le   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 4.14.0-103 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2142763    
Bug Blocks:    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Screenshot of storagesystem page none

Description Aaruni Aggarwal 2022-11-14 05:14:49 UTC
Created attachment 1924161 [details]
Screenshot of storagesystem page

Description of problem (please be detailed as possible and provide log
snippests):

Value of all the Fields (like Raw Capacity, Used Capacity, Latency etc.) in Storagesystem page shows 0

Version of all relevant components (if applicable):

OCP version - 4.12
ODF version - 4.12

Does this issue impact your ability to continue to work with the product
(please explain in detail what is the user impact)?
No

Is there any workaround available to the best of your knowledge?
No

Rate from 1 - 5 the complexity of the scenario you performed that caused this
bug (1 - very simple, 5 - very complex)?


Can this issue reproducible?
Yes

Can this issue reproduce from the UI?
Yes

If this is a regression, please provide more details to justify this:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Deploy ODF4.12 on OCP4.12 
2. Login to Web console and Navigate to Storage -> Data Foundation
3. Now click on Storagesystems tab from navbar and check all the values for the storagesystem


Actual results:
It shows values as 0B for all the fields like Raw Capacity.

Expected results:
It should show actual capacity.

Additional info:

Comment 14 arun kumar mohan 2023-04-10 06:11:19 UTC
Adding it back to QA. If it is still an issue, please re-open the BZ with steps.

Thanks,
Arun

Comment 16 Harish NV Rao 2023-05-25 05:57:24 UTC
(In reply to arun kumar mohan from comment #14)
> Adding it back to QA. If it is still an issue, please re-open the BZ with
> steps.
> 
> Thanks,
> Arun

Hi Arun,

IIUC, there is no fix (PR) done for this issue. You would like QE to retest it to see if the issue still persists based on the clarification you provided in comment 13. If yes, then ON_QA is not the right state. QE can retest and move it to closed state with resolution 'worksforme' if the issue is not reproduced. Could you please change the state to NEW/ASSIGNED?

Regards,
Harish

Comment 18 Harish NV Rao 2023-06-05 14:20:30 UTC
(In reply to Harish NV Rao from comment #16)
> (In reply to arun kumar mohan from comment #14)
> > Adding it back to QA. If it is still an issue, please re-open the BZ with
> > steps.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Arun
> 
> Hi Arun,
> 
> IIUC, there is no fix (PR) done for this issue. You would like QE to retest
> it to see if the issue still persists based on the clarification you
> provided in comment 13. If yes, then ON_QA is not the right state. QE can
> retest and move it to closed state with resolution 'worksforme' if the issue
> is not reproduced. Could you please change the state to NEW/ASSIGNED?
> 
> Regards,
> Harish

Arun, a gentle reminder ^^

Comment 19 arun kumar mohan 2023-06-06 08:52:40 UTC
Yes Harish, I want QE to retest it (as per comment#13) and check whether the issue is reproducible.
Moving it to 'NEW' state.

Comment 20 Sanjal Katiyar 2023-06-06 09:06:08 UTC
I remember there was a PR (diff BZ) which fixed this issue. Arun if u want u can add that PR to the BZ and move to ON_QA.

Comment 21 Mudit Agarwal 2023-06-06 12:14:57 UTC
Not a 4.13 blocker