Bug 2143289

Summary:	Update jpegxl to at least 0.7.0 in EPEL 9
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Neal Gompa <ngompa13>
Component:	jpegxl	Assignee:	Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel9	CC:	brandon.johnson, carl, davdunc, davide, michel, tdawson, zebob.m
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	jpegxl-0.7.0-1.el9	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-11-21 01:13:55 UTC	Type:	Component Upgrade
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2053866

Description Neal Gompa 2022-11-16 14:39:35 UTC

Description of problem:
Currently ffmpeg fails to build in EPEL 9 now because jpegxl is below version 0.7.0. Please consider upgrading jpegxl to at least 0.7.0 so that ffmpeg can be built in EPEL 9.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.6.1-8.el9

Comment 1 Neal Gompa 2022-11-16 14:42:40 UTC

According to DNF, there's only a few packages that need to be upgraded/rebuilt:

bash-5.1# dnf repoquery -q --whatrequires libjxl --qf "%{SOURCERPM}: %{REPOID}"
aom-3.2.0-4.el9.src.rpm: epel
jpegxl-0.6.1-8.el9.src.rpm: epel
kf5-kimageformats-5.90.0-2.el9.src.rpm: epel
kf5-kimageformats-5.96.0-2.el9.next.src.rpm: epel-next

Comment 2 Troy Dawson 2022-11-17 22:02:24 UTC

This is a incompatable upgrade.  It goes from libjxl.so.0.6 to libjxl.so.0.7

If we do this update, please remember to announce it, because it affects other repo's, and perhaps other users.

# dnf repoquery -q --whatrequires libjxl --qf "%{SOURCERPM}: %{REPOID}"
...
libheif-1.12.0-4.el9.src.rpm: rpmfusion-free-updates
xine-lib-1.2.12-7.el9.src.rpm: rpmfusion-free-updates

Comment 3 Neal Gompa 2022-11-18 03:11:20 UTC

Another way to resolve this quickly is to generate a compat subpackage (as libjxl0.6) as part of the upgrade with the old version until everything is rebuilt.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2022-11-19 20:58:22 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-adee3854d3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-adee3854d3

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2022-11-20 02:45:12 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-adee3854d3 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-adee3854d3

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2022-11-21 01:13:55 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-adee3854d3 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.