Bug 2143639
| Summary: | FTBFS with autoconf 2.72 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Frédéric Bérat <fberat> |
| Component: | am-utils | Assignee: | Ian Kent <ikent> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | ikent, kzak |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 2143303 | ||
AFAICT there isn't any way to get either a source or binary rpm of 2.72 that is appropriate for Fedora rawhide. If/when one is available I will have a look at what needs to be done. |
Autoconf 2.72 seems to be under preparation upstream, I therefore started to build dependent components to verify that they can be built once it lands in Fedora. Your component fails to build with the new version of autoconf, due to the following error: --- AMU: prepare acinclude.m4... AMU: autoreconf... am-utils requires autoconf 2.69 or 2.71, you have: autoreconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.72c.47-75861 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.SNwjVi (%prep) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.SNwjVi (%prep) --- Please adapt your component so that it support Autoconf 2.72.