Bug 2147460

Summary: [CEE][cephfs] cephfs-mirror service kept getting permission denied errors
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Scott Nipp <snipp>
Component: CephFSAssignee: Milind Changire <mchangir>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Hemanth Kumar <hyelloji>
Severity: medium Docs Contact: Eliska <ekristov>
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5.2CC: bhull, ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, ekristov, gfarnum, gjose, kdreyer, mchangir, sbaldwin, vereddy, vshankar
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Rebase
Target Release: 6.0   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ceph-17.2.5-1.el9cp Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.The CephFS now has the correct directory access Previously, directory access was denied even to the UID of 0 due to incorrect Discretionary Access Control (DAC) management. With this fix, directory access is allowed to UID 0 even if the actual permissions for the directory user, group, and others are not permissible for UID 0. This results in the correct Ceph File System (CephFS) behavior for directory access to UID 0 by effectively granting superuser privileges.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 2152849 2158286 2175175 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-03-20 18:59:40 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2126050, 2158286, 2175175    

Comment 11 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2023-01-04 16:35:51 UTC
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/46595 shipped in the v17.2.4 upstream release, so it's been downstream for a while

Comment 21 errata-xmlrpc 2023-03-20 18:59:40 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 6.0 Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:1360