Bug 2149533

Summary: [RFE - Stretch Cluster] Provide way for Cephadm orch to deploy new Monitor daemons with "crush_location" attribute
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Pawan <pdhiran>
Component: CephadmAssignee: Adam King <adking>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Vinayak Papnoi <vpapnoi>
Severity: high Docs Contact: Akash Raj <akraj>
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5.3CC: adking, akraj, cephqe-warriors, msaini, tserlin, vereddy
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 6.1   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ceph-17.2.6-31.el9cp Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
.Users can set the crush location for a Ceph Monitor to replace tiebreaker monitors With this release, users can set the crush location for a monitor deployed on a host. It should be assigned in the mon specification file. .Example ---- service_type: mon service_name: mon placement: hosts: - host1 - host2 - host3 spec: crush_locations: host1: - datacenter=a host2: - datacenter=b - rack=2 host3: - datacenter=a ---- This is primarily added to make the replacing of a tiebreaker monitor daemon in stretch clusters deployed by Cephadm, more feasible. Without this change, users would have to manually edit the files written by Cephadm to deploy the tiebreaker monitor, as the tiebreaker monitor is not allowed to join without declaring its crush location.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-06-15 09:16:25 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2192813    

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2023-06-15 09:16:25 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage 6.1 security and bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:3623