Bug 215120
Summary: | spurious entity errors | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Sam Steingold <sds> |
Component: | libXrender | Assignee: | Daniel Veillard <veillard> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 6 | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=373747&aid=1593909&group_id=21935 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 1.1.19-1 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-12-14 03:09:28 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Sam Steingold
2006-11-11 03:12:01 UTC
Sorry, that's a way too complex, non-isolated test case. I won't go though those but we fixed some entities processing errors in libxslt upstream. You're free to fetch libxslt CVS snapshot to check if this fixes the problem: http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/downloads.html Daniel The entities errors present in 1.1.18 should be fixed in 1.1.19 which is available as a FC6 Testing Update, Daniel libxslt-1.1.19-1.fc6.i386.rpm does not resolve the problem. Then provide an isolated test case showing the problem. Especially not depending on a snapshot of DocBook stylesheets. thanks, Daniel I don't think this behavior really depends on the snapshot. the latest release should be good (or rather bad) enough. https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1593909&group_id=21935&atid=373747 At least try to provide an isolated test case showing the problem. Have you looked at the size and complexity of the DocBook stylesheets ? Or at least make a minimal effort about it. Pointing me to your CVs repository gives me the message "we use that huge XSLT program, we don't know how it work, there is a problem when we use it, go debug it, we won't do even trivial effort to find out what's going wrong" Guess what, I don't know the docbook XSLT stylesheet code either, except that it's huge and use heavilly extensions like EXSLT. I'm fine debugging libxslt, I'm not thrilled going though thousands and thousands of lines of XSLT code I didn't wrote to try to find out what's going on, when my perception of the way it's asked it to just dump the whole stuff on me, just by pointing out to a CVS, and after repeatedly asking for an isolated test case. you see what I mean ? I should not have to beg repeatedly to try to get a decent feedback, don't you think so ? Daniel "I feel your pain" - I am often in a similar sutuation as you are now. Alas, I know little about xsl so the "trivial effort" is anything but. Please do not close this bug, I will try to keep it updated wrt my communications with the stylesheet authors on SF. thanks. the DocBook XSL maintainers owned up this bug, please see https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=373747&aid=1614469&group_id=21935 thanks for your patience. I know Bob Stayton and Norm Walsh, the entity error was I guess a problem with libxslt-0.1.18 but the xref linking error yeah that's a stylesheet problem. Well good to know it's all fixed ! Daniel |