Bug 2151493

Summary:	[RDR] A VR isn't marked secondary and cleanup of primary cluster remains stuck after Failover operation
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation	Reporter:	Aman Agrawal <amagrawa>
Component:	csi-driver	Assignee:	Madhu Rajanna <mrajanna>
Status:	ASSIGNED ---	QA Contact:	Aman Agrawal <amagrawa>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	4.12	CC:	bmekhiss, ebenahar, hekumar, idryomov, jsafrane, kseeger, muagarwa, odf-bz-bot, rar, srangana
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Automation
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	2184748 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Comment 38 Elad 2023-05-03 15:07:18 UTC

Mudit, Rakshith,

The decision to move this bug to 4.14.0 in comment #34 was based on the assumption that the issue hit in bug 2184748 is a separate one. 
But ever since then, bug 2184748 got closed as a DUP of this one, so that assumption turned out to be wrong.
Since we are able to reproduce, as mentioned by Aman in comment 30, and since the testing in 4.13 hasn't gained much momentum to date, we should keep this bug in 4.13.0 and not move it out.

Comment 39 Mudit Agarwal 2023-05-03 15:14:57 UTC

Elad, 
Bug #2184748 is duped to #2185953 and not this one. #2185953 is already proposed as a blocker for 4.13

Please correct me if I am missing anything here.

Comment 40 Elad 2023-05-03 15:24:25 UTC

You are right. I misread the bug number. Please disregard

Comment 51 Jan Safranek 2023-05-24 08:12:01 UTC

Just by reading comment #42, this sounds like https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/114207
It has been fixed in recent upstream releases, in 4.12 it should be fixed by https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/1582

Comment 52 Mudit Agarwal 2023-05-25 08:41:15 UTC

Jan, I guess Aman is using 4.13 here (comment #41) in which case we should not see this issue.

Comment 53 Jan Safranek 2023-05-25 11:14:47 UTC

4.13 is quite similar to 4.12 here:
- The bug was fixed in 1.26.5 upstream: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/114207#issuecomment-1535623925
- 4.13 has 1.26.3 and update to 1.26.5 has been just opened: https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/1586
It will take some time to merge & promote it in a OCP z-stream release.

Comment 55 Mudit Agarwal 2023-06-05 11:51:04 UTC

Thanks Jan.

Aman, https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/1586 is merged in OCP 4.13.
So, we should retest it now.

Meanwhile, this is not a TP blocker. Hence moving it out of 4.13

Comment 56 Aman Agrawal 2023-06-05 12:46:12 UTC

(In reply to Mudit Agarwal from comment #55)
> Thanks Jan.
> 
> Aman, https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/1586 is merged in OCP
> 4.13.
> So, we should retest it now.
> 
> Meanwhile, this is not a TP blocker. Hence moving it out of 4.13

Ack, noted!