Bug 2151493
Summary: | [OCP Tracker] [RDR] A VR isn't marked secondary and cleanup of primary cluster remains stuck after Failover operation | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation | Reporter: | Aman Agrawal <amagrawa> | |
Component: | distribution | Assignee: | Madhu Rajanna <mrajanna> | |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Sidhant Agrawal <sagrawal> | |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | unspecified | |||
Version: | 4.12 | CC: | bmekhiss, ebenahar, hekumar, idryomov, jsafrane, kramdoss, kseeger, muagarwa, ndevos, odf-bz-bot, rar, srangana | |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Automation, Tracking | |
Target Release: | ODF 4.15.0 | |||
Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
OS: | Unspecified | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | 4.15.0-112 | Doc Type: | No Doc Update | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 2184748 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2024-03-19 15:20:03 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: |
Comment 38
Elad
2023-05-03 15:07:18 UTC
Elad, Bug #2184748 is duped to #2185953 and not this one. #2185953 is already proposed as a blocker for 4.13 Please correct me if I am missing anything here. You are right. I misread the bug number. Please disregard Just by reading comment #42, this sounds like https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/114207 It has been fixed in recent upstream releases, in 4.12 it should be fixed by https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/1582 Jan, I guess Aman is using 4.13 here (comment #41) in which case we should not see this issue. 4.13 is quite similar to 4.12 here: - The bug was fixed in 1.26.5 upstream: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/114207#issuecomment-1535623925 - 4.13 has 1.26.3 and update to 1.26.5 has been just opened: https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/1586 It will take some time to merge & promote it in a OCP z-stream release. Thanks Jan. Aman, https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/1586 is merged in OCP 4.13. So, we should retest it now. Meanwhile, this is not a TP blocker. Hence moving it out of 4.13 (In reply to Mudit Agarwal from comment #55) > Thanks Jan. > > Aman, https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/1586 is merged in OCP > 4.13. > So, we should retest it now. > > Meanwhile, this is not a TP blocker. Hence moving it out of 4.13 Ack, noted! It looks like this is getting addressed by a fix in OpenShift, not in the Ceph-CSI driver. Adding the "Tracking" keyword to indicate no code changes in the selected component. Please do not move the bugs to ON_QA without the acks. Move it to MODIFIED if it is already fixed and ask for the acks. (In reply to Mudit Agarwal from comment #62) > Please do not move the bugs to ON_QA without the acks. Move it to MODIFIED > if it is already fixed and ask for the acks. Sorry, I probably misunderstood how OCP tracking bugs are handled then. There is no ODF build needed for this, it is purely an OpenShift fix. The OpenShift bugs are closed, so I assume a build of OCP is available that can be used for testing. Even without the acks the fix is included in recent/new deployments of ODF, and ready for QE to test. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.15.0 security, enhancement, & bug fix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1383 |