Bug 2152821

Summary:	ShellCheck-0.9.0 is available
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring>
Component:	ShellCheck	Assignee:	Dridi Boukelmoune <dridi.boukelmoune>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	dridi.boukelmoune, jamacku, petersen
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2024-08-07 11:35:31 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	2155800
Bug Blocks:

Description Upstream Release Monitoring 2022-12-13 07:33:21 UTC

Releases retrieved: 0.9.0
Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.9.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.8.0-3.fc37
URL: https://github.com/koalaman/shellcheck

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/4806/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ShellCheck

Comment 1 Upstream Release Monitoring 2022-12-13 07:33:29 UTC

Scratch build failed. Details below:

GenericError: File upload failed: cli-build/1670916807.5601614.KaVDHjhc/ShellCheck-0.9.0-1.fc36.src.rpm
Traceback:
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/hotness/use_cases/package_scratch_build_use_case.py", line 56, in build
    result = self.builder.build(request.package, request.opts)
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line 198, in build
    output["build_id"] = self._scratch_build(session, package.name, srpm)
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line 451, in _scratch_build
    session.uploadWrapper(source, serverdir)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/koji/__init__.py", line 3083, in uploadWrapper
    self.fastUpload(localfile, path, name, callback, blocksize, overwrite, volume=volume)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/koji/__init__.py", line 3018, in fastUpload
    raise GenericError("File upload failed: %s/%s" % (path, name))

If you think this issue is caused by some bug in the-new-hotness, please report it on the-new-hotness issue tracker: https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/issues

Comment 2 Jan Macku 2022-12-19 11:32:02 UTC

Hi,
I would love to have a new version of ShellCheck.

Could you please update to the new version once you have time?

Thanks lot!
Jan

Comment 3 Dridi Boukelmoune 2022-12-22 09:45:25 UTC

I worked on the package update but it fails for i386 builds, see this scratch build:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95610181

> + ghc --make -package Cabal -no-user-package-db -dynamic Setup
> epollCreate: invalid argument (Invalid argument)

I can reproduce it locally with mock, but it looks like ghc is completely broken:

> <mock-chroot> sh-5.2# ghc 
> epollCreate: invalid argument (Invalid argument)

Trying to run ghc with or without any command line arguments yields the same EINVAL.
Either ghc is broken for this architecture, or one of its dependencies is (libc,
kernel...) and after a quick search I found nothing so I will probably file a bug
report myself.

Comment 4 Dridi Boukelmoune 2022-12-22 12:42:22 UTC

Not sure how to mark this bug report as blocked by bug 2155800.

Comment 5 Jan Macku 2022-12-22 13:29:40 UTC

Thank you for working on this bug.

Comment 6 Jens Petersen 2022-12-26 12:55:35 UTC

This regression seems fixed now in glibc, thankfully.

I went ahead and pushed the rawhide build to koji now.