Bug 2153364

Summary:	[authselect] [ja_JP] Need translation changes for some strings in Japanese
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9	Reporter:	Bhushan Barve <bbarve>
Component:	authselect	Assignee:	Pavel Březina <pbrezina>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Sanket Saikia <ssaikia>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	9.1	CC:	jwboyer, pbrezina, ssaikia
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Translation, Triaged
Target Release:	---	Flags:	pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	authselect-1.2.6-2.el9	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-11-07 08:56:04 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Bhushan Barve 2022-12-14 13:19:15 UTC

Description of problem: As per the L10N QA results, need to update following strings in Japanese for authselect. This is as per the recommendation from localization team - 

"有効化" → "有効かを"
(create-profile) - 新規の authselect プロファイルを作成 → 新規の authselect プロファイルを作成します
(backup-restore) - バックアップからの復元 → バックアップから復元します
(debug) - エラーメッセージの印刷 → エラーメッセージをプリントします
(trace) - トレースメッセージの印刷 → トレースメッセージをプリントします
(warn) - 警告メッセージの印刷 →  警告メッセージをプリントします




Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
authselect-1.2.5-1.el9.x86_64

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Pavel Březina 2023-01-06 11:33:24 UTC

Can you check the latest version from 8.7 and 9.2? I.e. 1.2.6?

Comment 20 errata-xmlrpc 2023-11-07 08:56:04 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (authselect bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:6695