Bug 2153627

Summary: [DDF] Is this always nessacary to do? If, for example, corruption is on the software level, the device doesn't need to
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation Reporter: Direct Docs Feedback <ddf-bot>
Component: documentationAssignee: Anjana Suparna Sriram <asriram>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Neha Berry <nberry>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 4.10CC: odf-bz-bot
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Direct Docs Feedback 2022-12-14 23:23:15 UTC 
Is this always nessacary to do? If, for example, corruption is on the software level, the device doesn't need to be removed from the node.

Reported by: rhn-support-kelwhite

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openshift_data_foundation/4.10/html/replacing_devices/openshift_data_foundation_deployed_using_local_storage_devices#annotations:3b538b6f-b4aa-465b-82b5-35f1ddb6f7dd