Bug 2156350
Summary: | F38FailsToInstall: ghc-hadolint, ghc-hadolint-devel, ghc-hadolint-prof | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Fedora Fails To Install <fti-bugs> |
Component: | hadolint | Assignee: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dridi.boukelmoune, petersen, pikachu.2014 |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | hadolint-2.8.0-9.fc38 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2022-12-29 17:45:40 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 2117177 |
Description
Fedora Fails To Install
2022-12-26 15:57:11 UTC
Sorry this is my bad - well ShellCheck was bumped to 0.9.0 in Rawhide and forgot to think about this dependent package. I would have built it for rawhide myself if I got a chance after bug 2155800 was solved, the only difference being that I wasn't aware of hadolint until now and can't rebuild it myself. In theory a rebuild should be enough, it depends on ShellCheck >=0.8.0, or did such an attempt fail? (In reply to Dridi Boukelmoune from comment #2) > I would have built it for rawhide myself if I got a chance after bug 2155800 > was solved, the only difference being that I wasn't aware of hadolint until > now and can't rebuild it myself. No worries > In theory a rebuild should be enough, it depends on ShellCheck >=0.8.0, or > did such an attempt fail? No it didn't fail :) I just added you for awareness, thank you Probably best to try to coordinate updates in future, or maybe you can also request access to ShellCheck for this. I am also quite happy to help out since I am a ProvenPackager and looking over our Haskell packages in general. :-) > or maybe you can also request access to ShellCheck for this.
You probably meant access to hadolint, will do.
Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically by https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at https://pagure.io/releng/ All subpackages of a package against which this bug was filled are now installable or removed from Fedora 38. Thanks for taking care of it! |