Bug 2157766

Summary:	Please branch and build python-fastavro in epel9
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jonathan Wright <jonathan>
Component:	python-fastavro	Assignee:	Ben Beasley <code>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	code, neuro-sig, sanjay.ankur
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	python-fastavro-1.7.0-2.el9	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-01-13 00:41:23 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2144663

Description Jonathan Wright 2023-01-02 21:03:58 UTC

Please branch and build python-fastavro in epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain python-fastavro in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-fastavro/addgroup
and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.

I would also be happy to be a co-maintainer (FAS: jonathanspw).

I can be the primary contact for EPEL (FAS: jonathanspw).

Comment 1 Ben Beasley 2023-01-03 04:59:34 UTC

No matching package to install: 'python3dist(lz4)' (bug 2157768)
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(pandas)' (bug 2032550)

The lz4 dependency can be worked around by omitting the lz4 and codecs extras; the pandas test dependency can be worked around by skipping the pandas integration tests.

Ankur, I’m going to go ahead and request the EPEL9 branch for this and build it, working as a neuro-sig member and as the person who’s done the last few updates of this package. I’m happy to be the EPEL bug assignee. I would also be happy to have Jonathan as a co-maintainer.

Comment 2 Ben Beasley 2023-01-03 05:00:10 UTC

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/50178

Comment 3 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2023-01-03 10:04:54 UTC

Sure thing, sounds good.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2023-01-04 04:31:29 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4ca9a8d9da has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4ca9a8d9da

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2023-01-05 00:27:02 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4ca9a8d9da has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4ca9a8d9da

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2023-01-13 00:41:23 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4ca9a8d9da has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.