Bug 2158438

Summary: RHEL 9.2: Rebase mingw-binutils to match Fedora Rawhide
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Reporter: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones>
Component: mingw-binutilsAssignee: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: tingting zheng <tzheng>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 9.2CC: ailan, rjones, tpelka, tyan
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---Flags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: mingw-binutils-2.39-2.el9 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-05-09 08:27:02 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Richard W.M. Jones 2023-01-05 12:59:12 UTC
This bug was initially created as a copy of Bug #2135769

I am copying this bug because: 



Description of problem:

This is a general rebase bug to rebase mingw-gcc to the match Fedora Rawhide
in RHEL 9.2.

The plan for RHEL 9.2 is here:
https://lists.corp.redhat.com/archives/v2v-devel/2022-August/000028.html

Comment 1 Richard W.M. Jones 2023-01-05 14:02:55 UTC
We've done the work on these already, and they are not supported
hence don't need testing, so please don't NAK them.

Comment 6 tingting zheng 2023-01-09 05:54:53 UTC
Tested with:
mingw-binutils-2.39-2.el9

The package can be installed successfully and it's included in latest nightly compose, so move the bug to VERIFIED.

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2023-05-09 08:27:02 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (mingw-binutils bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:2596