Bug 2159491

Summary:	[RFE] Add syncable format to incremental exports
Product:	Red Hat Satellite	Reporter:	Jessica Richards <jrichards2>
Component:	Pulp	Assignee:	satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Vladimír Sedmík <vsedmik>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.11.0
Target Milestone:	Unspecified
Target Release:	Unused
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-01-23 17:37:42 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jessica Richards 2023-01-09 19:01:24 UTC

1. Proposed title of this feature request

[RFE]  Add syncable format to incremental exports

3. What is the nature and description of the request?

The hammer command can be used to create complete exports in syncable (RPM) format using the option '--format syncable'.  However, this option is not available for incremental exports.  The customer would like this option to be made available for incremental exports.

4. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)

personal preference

5. How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)

6. For each functional requirement listed, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.

7. Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat Bugzilla?

no

8. Does the customer have any specific timeline dependencies and which release would they like to target (i.e. RHEL8, RHEL9)?

no

9. Is the sales team involved in this request and do they have any additional input?

no

10. List any affected packages or components.

hammer, pulp

11. Would the customer be able to assist in testing this functionality if implemented?

yes

Comment 2 Brad Buckingham 2023-01-10 21:09:04 UTC

Hello Jessica,

This appears to be a duplicate of bug 2143497.  Do you agree?

If so, we can close this one as a duplicate and the case can be tracked against the other bugzilla.

Thanks!

Comment 3 Jessica Richards 2023-01-23 17:32:07 UTC

Brad,

Yes, I agree with you.  Thank you for catching that!

--
Jessica

Comment 4 Brad Buckingham 2023-01-23 17:37:42 UTC

Thanks Jessica!

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2143497 ***