Bug 216147
Summary: | Installer crashed with error block.dmraid.GroupingError on system which had preexisting md raid | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Ethan Sommer <sommere> |
Component: | python-pyblock | Assignee: | Hans de Goede <hdegoede> |
Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5.0 | CC: | ddumas, syeghiay |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://homepages.gac.edu/~sommere/rhel5b2installcrash.JPG | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-10-07 13:39:46 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Ethan Sommer
2006-11-17 14:37:34 UTC
Moving to RHEL 5.5 so it doesn't get mistakenly closed by the bot Very strange behavior. And, ofcourse, I can't reproduce :). I think its directly linked to the setup you have on the box. Can you please run the following script on tty2. As soon as you get tty2. <script> import block rss = block.getRaidSet() </script> run it as like this `python scriptName`. You can also execute it in a python console. Pls post the output. Ethan, Does the system in question actually have BIOS RAID? Or is the raid you mention it has all software raid (mdraid) or full hardware RAID ? I filed this bug in 2006... I am almost positive it was mdraid (as the subject of the bug states) If I remember correctly, I used dd to wipe out the drives and was then able to install. I _assume_ this has been fixed in the almost 3 years that have past... Obviously I can't run a script on the system. I'm not even sure we still HAVE that system, but it has probably been reinstalled a few times since then in any case. Hmm, you are right, we did leave this one lingering very long, sorry about that. Ok, closing this as insufficient info then. |