Bug 2162328

Summary:	[RHEL-9] Undeclared file conflicts: binutils
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9	Reporter:	Zdenek Veleba <zveleba>
Component:	binutils	Assignee:	Nick Clifton <nickc>
binutils sub component:	system-version	QA Contact:	Miloš Prchlík <mprchlik>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	Docs Contact:
Severity:	unspecified
Priority:	unspecified	CC:	fweimer, mprchlik, ohudlick, sipoyare
Version:	9.2	Keywords:	Bugfix, Triaged
Target Milestone:	rc	Flags:	pm-rhel: mirror+
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	binutils-2.35.2-37.el9	Doc Type:	No Doc Update
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-05-09 08:24:17 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Zdenek Veleba 2023-01-19 11:08:04 UTC

Description of problem:
binutils has undeclared file conflicts in RHEL-9

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHEL-9.2.0-20230115.7
binutils-devel-2.35.2-35.el9.i686
binutils-devel-2.35.2-35.el9.x86_64

Steps to Reproduce:
Try to install the aforementioned packages together

Actual results:
binutils-devel-2.35.2-35.el9.i686.rpm binutils-devel-2.35.2-35.el9.x86_64.rpm
warning: /root/tmp.SUmEXG2DHY/rpms/binutils-devel-2.35.2-35.el9.i686.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID fd431d51: NOKEY
file /usr/include/bfd_stdint.h conflicts between attempted installs of binutils-devel-2.35.2-35.el9.i686 and binutils-devel-2.35.2-35.el9.x86_64


Expected result:
No conflicts in case packages that are expected to be installable together , e.g. multilib packages
Declared conflicts where the conflict is expected

Additional information:
This bug was generated by RTT semiautomatic-reporting workflow

Comment 1 Nick Clifton 2023-01-19 12:16:29 UTC

  % diff usr-x86_64/include/bfd_stdint.h \
         usr-i686/include/bfd_stdint.h 
1c1
< /* generated for  x86_64-redhat-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.3.1 20221121 (Red Hat 11.3.1-4) */
---
> /* generated for  i686-redhat-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.3.1 20221121 (Red Hat 11.3.1-4) */
  %

*sigh*  Guess I need to remove that comment.

Comment 2 Nick Clifton 2023-01-19 16:47:48 UTC

Fixed in binutils-2.35.2-36.el9

Comment 3 Nick Clifton 2023-01-20 10:58:04 UTC

CI gating has found a problem with the -36 binutils.  Some of the cross-binutils executables are leaking into the native packages.  I am working on a fix.

Comment 4 Nick Clifton 2023-01-20 12:21:49 UTC

Fixed in binutils-2.35.2-37.el9.

Comment 7 Miloš Prchlík 2023-02-06 08:47:11 UTC

Verified with binutils-2.35.2-37.el9.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2023-05-09 08:24:17 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (binutils bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:2548