Bug 2166512
Summary: | VM can't start because of requests/limits CPU number mismatch after adding the overallocated one | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Container Native Virtualization (CNV) | Reporter: | Gu Nini <ngu> |
Component: | Virtualization | Assignee: | lpivarc |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Akriti Gupta <akrgupta> |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | urgent | ||
Version: | 4.12.1 | CC: | acardace, alougovs, danken, jortialc, juzhang, kbidarka, lijin, mtosatti, ocohen, vromanso |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 4.13.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | hco-bundle-registry-container-v4.13.0.rhel9-1639 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2023-05-18 02:57:25 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Gu Nini
2023-02-02 04:24:32 UTC
verified on v4.13.0.rhel9-1689 [akriti@fedora cnv-tests]$ oc get vmi NAME AGE PHASE IP NODENAME READY example 2m44s Running 10.129.2.79 virt-akr-413-mdxr5-worker-0-2crmn True [akriti@fedora cnv-tests]$ oc get vm example -o json | jq .spec.template.spec.domain.resources { "limits": { "cpu": "4", "memory": "8Gi" }, "requests": { "cpu": "4", "memory": "8Gi" } } VM is running successfully Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: OpenShift Virtualization 4.13.0 Images security, bug fix, and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:3205 (In reply to Marcelo Tosatti from comment #5) > (In reply to sgott from comment #2) > > Targetting this to 4.13, but we will certainly need to backport it once > > fixed. > > Yes, it would be good to have backports for 4.12.z on this. > Hit this on a customers PoC, and also have the documentation: > > > https://access.redhat.com/solutions/7007632 > Marcelo, can you start this by proposing a backporting PR? Kaedar, would you file a 4.12 backport BZ? The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days |