Bug 216785

Tell me how can i use this package or test its working in FC6 core?

There are a number of sample scripts that come in the examples directory (or,
when the rpm is installed, under %doc).  Running one or more of those should
enable you to examine the functionailty of the module proper.

Did mock build and found under build.log
Unrecognized argument in LIBS ignored: '-pthread'
Got some rpmlint Warnings
W: perl-Gnome2-Print devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Print/Install/gnomeprintperl-autogen.h
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel
package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to
create a development package.

W: perl-Gnome2-Print devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Print/Install/gnomeprintperl-version.h
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel
package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to
create a development package.

W: perl-Gnome2-Print devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Print/Install/gnomeprintperl.h
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel
package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to
create a development package.

are those can be ignored for perl packages??

Those warnings can be safely ignored for perl packages.

Not able to find license file(Is am i missing something)?
Still Unrecognized argument in LIBS ignored: '-pthread' message coming
not understanding which causes this message to appear?

(In reply to comment #5)
> Not able to find license file(Is am i missing something)?
Yes, you are missing something: Nobody is obliged to ship one.

Perl module files typically contain licenses embedded into their source files.

> Still Unrecognized argument in LIBS ignored: '-pthread' message coming
> not understanding which causes this message to appear?
IIRC, this is a bug/crappy code somewhere in some of the perl-Gtk/Gnome
infrastructure. I recall this had appeared several times before, but I don't
recall all details on how this had been resolved. Googling/searching bugzilla
might provide further insights.

Does that be a blocker?

(In reply to comment #7)
> Does that be a blocker?
I just found a reference:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166252

... so people seem to preferr to ignore this bug :(

Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and but NOT for RPMS.
  But those warnings are ignored.
+ source files match upstream.
66578c2ffaebbe035a0735e65ad71c3f  Gnome2-Print-1.000.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.  License text included in package.
+ %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required.
+ %doc does not affect runtime.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Dose owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Followed perl packaging guidelines.
APPROVED.

Don't Forget to CLOSE this with NEXTRELEASE

Imported and building for devel; branches requested for FC5,6.

Thanks for the review! :)