Bug 2169185

Summary: Review Request: moarvm, nqp and rakudo
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Felix Wang <topazus>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: h-k-81, mhjacks, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-02-14 05:49:56 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Comment 1 blinxen 2023-02-12 19:36:31 UTC
Since you are not yet in the packaging group (https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/topazus/groups), I would suggest to read the following:

* https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/
* https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/How_to_Get_Sponsored_into_the_Packager_Group/
* https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
* https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/#claiming

After you get sponsored, you can start taking orphaned packages.

Looking at the packages all of them seem to be retired (and not orphaned). To un-retire them you will have to create a package review for each of them. See the last link in the list. I hope this helps.

Comment 2 Felix Wang 2023-02-14 04:56:04 UTC
(In reply to h-k-81 from comment #1)
> Since you are not yet in the packaging group
> (https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/topazus/groups), I would suggest to read
> the following:
> 
> *
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/
> Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/
> *
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/
> How_to_Get_Sponsored_into_the_Packager_Group/
> * https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
> *
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/
> Package_Retirement_Process/#claiming
> 
> After you get sponsored, you can start taking orphaned packages.
> 
> Looking at the packages all of them seem to be retired (and not orphaned).
> To un-retire them you will have to create a package review for each of them.
> See the last link in the list. I hope this helps.

After reading the links you offered, I still need your clarifications. I need to create three seperate review requests of moarvm, nqp and rakudo packages in Bugzilla, and get them approved. Then I take the approved review requests to get sponsored and add into the packager group.

Comment 3 Felix Wang 2023-02-14 04:58:19 UTC
(In reply to Felix Wang from comment #2)
> (In reply to h-k-81 from comment #1)
> > Since you are not yet in the packaging group
> > (https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/topazus/groups), I would suggest to read
> > the following:
> > 
> > *
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/
> > Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/
> > *
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/
> > How_to_Get_Sponsored_into_the_Packager_Group/
> > * https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
> > *
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/
> > Package_Retirement_Process/#claiming
> > 
> > After you get sponsored, you can start taking orphaned packages.
> > 
> > Looking at the packages all of them seem to be retired (and not orphaned).
> > To un-retire them you will have to create a package review for each of them.
> > See the last link in the list. I hope this helps.
> 
> After reading the links you offered, I still need your clarifications. I
> need to create three seperate review requests of moarvm, nqp and rakudo
> packages in Bugzilla, and get them approved. Then I take the approved review
> requests to get sponsored and add into the packager group.

Do I understand right?

Comment 4 Felix Wang 2023-02-14 05:49:56 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2169611 ***

Comment 5 Martin Jackson 2023-02-21 03:08:05 UTC
Yes, that's right. The first successful review is enough to be added to the packager group; but each package must be reviewed on its own.