Bug 2169238
Summary: | Review Request: whatip - Info on your IP address | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowi> | ||||
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Neal Gompa <ngompa13> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | ngompa13, package-review | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | ngompa13:
fedora-review+
|
||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
URL: | https://gitlab.gnome.org/GabMus/whatip | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2023-02-23 02:18:34 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Yaakov Selkowitz
2023-02-13 02:00:57 UTC
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5520349 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2169238-whatip/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05520349-whatip/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. Spec review: > desktop-file-validate %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/%{app_id}.desktop > appstream-util validate-relax --nonet %{buildroot}%{_metainfodir}/%{app_id}.appdata.xml Nit: These should be in %check so that it's obvious they're part of package verification > %{python3_sitelib}/%{name} Please add a trailing slash so that it's obvious the RPM that this is a directory. > %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/*/%{app_id}* This means we need "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme" in the package. > %{_datadir}/%{name} Please add a trailing slash so that it's obvious the RPM that this is a directory. (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #2) > Nit: These should be in %check so that it's obvious they're part of package verification The guidelines state either %check or %install without preference. > Please add a trailing slash so that it's obvious the RPM that this is a directory. I'm not against this, but this seems to be a style choice rather than a guidelines question. > This means we need "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme" in the package. Added. Spec URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/whatip.spec SRPM URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/whatip-1.1-1.fc39.src.rpm Description: What IP displays information on your local network, IP addresses and open ports. Fedora Account System Username: yselkowitz Created attachment 1943870 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5520349 to 5522752
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5522752 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2169238-whatip/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05522752-whatip/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. (In reply to Yaakov Selkowitz from comment #3) > (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #2) > > Nit: These should be in %check so that it's obvious they're part of package verification > > The guidelines state either %check or %install without preference. > > > Please add a trailing slash so that it's obvious the RPM that this is a directory. > > I'm not against this, but this seems to be a style choice rather than a > guidelines question. > We really should add this to the guidelines, but the reason for this is to prevent accidental directory->file transitions, which can cause RPM upgrade failures. (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #7) > We really should add this to the guidelines, but the reason for this is to > prevent accidental directory->file transitions, which can cause RPM upgrade > failures. Generally speaking e.g. %{_datadir}/%{name} isn't about to become a file. Any guidelines along these lines IMO should be limited in avoiding potential future collisions in specific known cases rather than dictating syntax/style. In any case, I already added these in the previous update. Everything looks good, then. PACKAGE APPROVED. The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/whatip FEDORA-2023-b55f632014 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-b55f632014 FEDORA-2023-b55f632014 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-b55f632014 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-b55f632014 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2023-b55f632014 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |