Bug 2169429
| Summary: | Handle upgrades to rhel9 with layered packages | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | Colin Walters <walters> |
| Component: | rpm-ostree | Assignee: | RHCOS SST <rhcos-sst> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | HuijingHei <hhei> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 8.8 | CC: | hhei, xiaofwan |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Release: | --- | Flags: | pm-rhel:
mirror+
|
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | rpm-ostree-2022.10.112.g3d0ac35b-2.el8 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-05-16 08:24:00 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Colin Walters
2023-02-13 15:07:13 UTC
To verify this basically: Provision a RHEL8 rpm-ostree system (RHCOS, I'd assume Edge too), then layer or override a package (rpm-ostree install etc.). Then rebase to RHEL9. Without this change, you should get a failure to write the rpmdb. With this patch, the rebase should work. Thanks Colin for the detail instructions. Verify passed with rpm-ostree-2022.10.112.g3d0ac35b-2.el8 on RHCOS 412.86.202302080410-0 using the steps in Comment 2 Verified on RHEL for Edge 8.8 to 9.2 with rpm-ostree-2022.10.112.g3d0ac35b-2.el8.rpm. $ sudo rpm-ostree rebase rhel-edge:rhel/9/x86_64/edge' 2901 metadata, 19309 content objects fetched; 776884 KiB transferred in 22 seconds; 1.3 GB content written Writing objects: 5...done Checking out tree ffa81a8...done Rewriting rpmdb back to host bdb...done No enabled rpm-md repositories. Importing rpm-md...done Resolving dependencies...done Relabeling...done Checking out packages...done Running pre scripts...done Running post scripts...done Running posttrans scripts...done Writing rpmdb...done Writing OSTree commit...done Staging deployment...done Freed: 60.8 MB (pkgcache branches: 1) Verify passed using rpm-ostree-2022.10.112.g3d0ac35b-3.el8 from RHCOS 412.86.202302231508-0 to centos-stream-coreos-9:4.12-x86_64
[core@cosa-devsh ~]$ rpm -q rpm-ostree
rpm-ostree-2022.10.112.g3d0ac35b-3.el8.x86_64
[root@cosa-devsh ~]# rpm-ostree override remove strace
Checking out tree 2203ba2... done
Resolving dependencies... done
Applying 1 override
Processing packages... done
Writing rpmdb... done
Writing OSTree commit... done
Staging deployment... done
Removed:
strace-5.13-4.el8.x86_64
Use "rpm-ostree override reset" to undo overrides
Run "systemctl reboot" to start a reboot
[root@cosa-devsh ~]# rpm-ostree status
State: idle
Deployments:
2203ba2dd29bbde665aed2c18107029f154e87b87fb7c46adf5da2f799a4ad32
Version: 412.86.202302231508-0 (2023-02-23T15:12:01Z)
Diff: 1 removed
RemovedBasePackages: strace 5.13-4.el8
* 2203ba2dd29bbde665aed2c18107029f154e87b87fb7c46adf5da2f799a4ad32
Version: 412.86.202302231508-0 (2023-02-23T15:12:01Z)
[root@cosa-devsh ~]# rpm-ostree rebase --experimental ostree-unverified-registry:quay.io/okd/centos-stream-coreos-9:4.12-x86_64
[root@cosa-devsh ~]# systemctl reboot
[core@cosa-devsh ~]$ rpm-ostree status
State: idle
Deployments:
● ostree-unverified-registry:quay.io/okd/centos-stream-coreos-9:4.12-x86_64
Digest: sha256:3a9d3dfc48c6ad82eab26334fa4cfa2975f54c6842a7c42a48af767aa553835f
Version: 412.9.202302230439-0 (2023-02-27T01:50:47Z)
RemovedBasePackages: strace 5.18-2.el9
2203ba2dd29bbde665aed2c18107029f154e87b87fb7c46adf5da2f799a4ad32
Version: 412.86.202302231508-0 (2023-02-23T15:12:01Z)
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (rpm-ostree bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:2759 |