Bug 216995
Summary: | azureus crashes in SWT | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Nicholas Miell <nmiell> |
Component: | eclipse | Assignee: | Ben Konrath <ben> |
Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 6 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-11-23 02:49:45 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Nicholas Miell
2006-11-23 01:36:57 UTC
Ok, it crashed again, so I switched to GCJ and restarted Azureus and this time it did not crash. So, this seems to be exclusively a problem with SWT and Sun Java. (In reply to comment #1) > So, this seems to be exclusively a problem with SWT and Sun Java. ... which we can't fix because it's closed source. I'm glad it works with gcj. Closing CANTFIX. Alternately, SWT's JNI is buggy, but GCJ doesn't show the bug. (In reply to comment #3) > Alternately, SWT's JNI is buggy, but GCJ doesn't show the bug. :) Argue that with them upstream if you want. Without a reproducer with what we ship (the free stack), it's hard to see how we'll progress fixing this. Perhaps it's an azureus bug? Sorry, I assumed Red Hat was doing more with this part of the Java stack than just shipping it. Looks like you aren't and your SWT is surprisingly unmodified from upstream. :) I'll file upstream as soon as I can find a version of gdb that both doesn't crash on the core dump and can actually find the debug symbols. (In reply to comment #5) > Sorry, I assumed Red Hat was doing more with this part of the Java stack than > just shipping it. Looks like you aren't and your SWT is surprisingly unmodified > from upstream. :) We try to do as much upstream as possible. Plus, upstream does an excellent job without our help :) > I'll file upstream as soon as I can find a version of gdb that both doesn't > crash on the core dump and can actually find the debug symbols. Cool, thanks. CC me on the bug if you remember. |