Bug 2171100

Scratch build failed. Details below:

FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/var/tmp/thn-fn1jcgzj/%{_hdf5_version}'
Traceback:
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/hotness/use_cases/package_scratch_build_use_case.py", line 56, in build
    result = self.builder.build(request.package, request.opts)
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line 198, in build
    output["build_id"] = self._scratch_build(session, package.name, srpm)
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line 451, in _scratch_build
    session.uploadWrapper(source, serverdir)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/koji/__init__.py", line 3110, in uploadWrapper
    self.fastUpload(localfile, path, name, callback, blocksize, overwrite, volume=volume)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/koji/__init__.py", line 2988, in fastUpload
    fo = open(localfile, 'rb')

If you think this issue is caused by some bug in the-new-hotness, please report it on the-new-hotness issue tracker: https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/issues

Releases retrieved: 9.3.0.rc1
Upstream release that is considered latest: 9.3.0.rc1
Current version/release in rawhide: 9.2.6-6.fc39
URL: http://vtk.org/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/15084/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vtk

Scratch build failed. Details below:

BuilderException: Build failed:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-mrt523le/vtk.spec']' returned non-zero exit status 1.

StdOut:
warning: line 148: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires: hdf5 = %{_hdf5_version}
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1692057600
error: Bad file: ./VTKData-9.3.0.rc1.tar.gz: No such file or directory
error: Bad file: ./VTK-9.3.0.rc1.tar.gz: No such file or directory

RPM build warnings:
    line 148: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires: hdf5 = %{_hdf5_version}

RPM build errors:
    Bad file: ./VTKData-9.3.0.rc1.tar.gz: No such file or directory
    Bad file: ./VTK-9.3.0.rc1.tar.gz: No such file or directory


Traceback:
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/hotness/use_cases/package_scratch_build_use_case.py", line 56, in build
    result = self.builder.build(request.package, request.opts)
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line 229, in build
    raise BuilderException(

If you think this issue is caused by some bug in the-new-hotness, please report it on the-new-hotness issue tracker: https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/issues

Created attachment 1983457 [details]
Update to 9.3.0.rc1 (#2171100)

Releases retrieved: 9.3.0.rc2
Upstream release that is considered latest: 9.3.0.rc2
Current version/release in rawhide: 9.2.6-9.fc40
URL: http://vtk.org/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/15084/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vtk

Scratch build failed. Details below:

BuilderException: Build failed:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-49771ah3/vtk.spec']' returned non-zero exit status 1.

StdOut:
warning: line 162: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires: hdf5 = %{_hdf5_version}
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1698883200
error: Bad file: ./VTKData-9.3.0.rc2.tar.gz: No such file or directory
error: Bad file: ./VTK-9.3.0.rc2.tar.gz: No such file or directory

RPM build warnings:
    line 162: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires: hdf5 = %{_hdf5_version}

RPM build errors:
    Bad file: ./VTKData-9.3.0.rc2.tar.gz: No such file or directory
    Bad file: ./VTK-9.3.0.rc2.tar.gz: No such file or directory


Traceback:
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/hotness/use_cases/package_scratch_build_use_case.py", line 56, in build
    result = self.builder.build(request.package, request.opts)
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line 229, in build
    raise BuilderException(

If you think this issue is caused by some bug in the-new-hotness, please report it on the-new-hotness issue tracker: https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/issues

Created attachment 1996800 [details]
Update to 9.3.0.rc2 (#2171100)

Releases retrieved: 9.3.0
Upstream release that is considered latest: 9.3.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 9.2.6-10.fc40
URL: http://vtk.org/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/15084/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vtk

Scratch build failed. Details below:

BuilderException: Build failed:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-6_8lyhso/vtk.spec']' returned non-zero exit status 1.

StdOut:
warning: line 162: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires: hdf5 = %{_hdf5_version}
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1699920000
error: Bad file: ./VTKData-9.3.0.tar.gz: No such file or directory
error: Bad file: ./VTK-9.3.0.tar.gz: No such file or directory

RPM build warnings:
    line 162: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires: hdf5 = %{_hdf5_version}

RPM build errors:
    Bad file: ./VTKData-9.3.0.tar.gz: No such file or directory
    Bad file: ./VTK-9.3.0.tar.gz: No such file or directory


Traceback:
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/hotness/use_cases/package_scratch_build_use_case.py", line 56, in build
    result = self.builder.build(request.package, request.opts)
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line 229, in build
    raise BuilderException(

If you think this issue is caused by some bug in the-new-hotness, please report it on the-new-hotness issue tracker: https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/issues

Created attachment 1999368 [details]
Update to 9.3.0 (#2171100)

Releases retrieved: 9.3.1
Upstream release that is considered latest: 9.3.1
Current version/release in rawhide: 9.2.6-16.fc41
URL: http://vtk.org/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/15084/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vtk

Scratch build failed. Details below:

BuilderException: Build failed:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-tjgcxg4q/vtk.spec']' returned non-zero exit status 1.

StdOut:
warning: line 164: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires: hdf5 = %{_hdf5_version}
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1719964800
error: Bad file: ./VTKData-9.3.1.tar.gz: No such file or directory
error: Bad file: ./VTK-9.3.1.tar.gz: No such file or directory

RPM build warnings:
    line 164: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires: hdf5 = %{_hdf5_version}

RPM build errors:
    Bad file: ./VTKData-9.3.1.tar.gz: No such file or directory
    Bad file: ./VTK-9.3.1.tar.gz: No such file or directory


Traceback:
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/hotness/use_cases/package_scratch_build_use_case.py", line 56, in build
    result = self.builder.build(request.package, request.opts)
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line 229, in build
    raise BuilderException(

If you think this issue is caused by some bug in the-new-hotness, please report it on the-new-hotness issue tracker: https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/issues

Created attachment 2038914 [details]
Update to 9.3.1 (#2171100)

Releases retrieved: 9.4.0.rc2
Upstream release that is considered latest: 9.4.0.rc2
Current version/release in rawhide: 9.2.6-18.fc42
URL: http://vtk.org/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/15084/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vtk

Scratch build failed. Details below:

BuilderException: Build failed:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-9svn30d8/vtk.spec']' returned non-zero exit status 1.

StdOut:
warning: line 168: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires: hdf5 = %{_hdf5_version}
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1729555200
error: Bad file: ./VTKData-9.4.0.rc2.tar.gz: No such file or directory
error: Bad file: ./VTK-9.4.0.rc2.tar.gz: No such file or directory

RPM build warnings:
    line 168: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires: hdf5 = %{_hdf5_version}

RPM build errors:
    Bad file: ./VTKData-9.4.0.rc2.tar.gz: No such file or directory
    Bad file: ./VTK-9.4.0.rc2.tar.gz: No such file or directory


Traceback:
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/hotness/use_cases/package_scratch_build_use_case.py", line 56, in build
    result = self.builder.build(request.package, request.opts)
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line 229, in build
    raise BuilderException(

If you think this issue is caused by some bug in the-new-hotness, please report it on the-new-hotness issue tracker: https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/issues

Created attachment 2053146 [details]
Update to 9.4.0.rc2 (#2171100)

Releases retrieved: 9.4.0.rc3
Upstream release that is considered latest: 9.4.0.rc3
Current version/release in rawhide: 9.2.6-21.fc42
URL: http://vtk.org/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/15084/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vtk

Scratch build failed. Details below:

BuilderException: Build failed:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-l6rjykoh/vtk.spec']' returned non-zero exit status 1.

StdOut:
warning: line 168: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires: hdf5 = %{_hdf5_version}
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1731456000
error: Bad file: ./VTKData-9.4.0.rc3.tar.gz: No such file or directory
error: Bad file: ./VTK-9.4.0.rc3.tar.gz: No such file or directory

RPM build warnings:
    line 168: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires: hdf5 = %{_hdf5_version}

RPM build errors:
    Bad file: ./VTKData-9.4.0.rc3.tar.gz: No such file or directory
    Bad file: ./VTK-9.4.0.rc3.tar.gz: No such file or directory


Traceback:
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/hotness/use_cases/package_scratch_build_use_case.py", line 56, in build
    result = self.builder.build(request.package, request.opts)
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line 229, in build
    raise BuilderException(

If you think this issue is caused by some bug in the-new-hotness, please report it on the-new-hotness issue tracker: https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/issues

Created attachment 2057579 [details]
Update to 9.4.0.rc3 (#2171100)

Releases retrieved: 9.4.0
Upstream release that is considered latest: 9.4.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 9.2.6-21.fc42
URL: http://vtk.org/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/15084/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vtk

Scratch build failed. Details below:

BuilderException: Build failed:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-4aggvp1n/vtk.spec']' returned non-zero exit status 1.

StdOut:
warning: line 168: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires: hdf5 = %{_hdf5_version}
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1732579200
error: Bad file: ./VTKData-9.4.0.tar.gz: No such file or directory
error: Bad file: ./VTK-9.4.0.tar.gz: No such file or directory

RPM build warnings:
    line 168: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires: hdf5 = %{_hdf5_version}

RPM build errors:
    Bad file: ./VTKData-9.4.0.tar.gz: No such file or directory
    Bad file: ./VTK-9.4.0.tar.gz: No such file or directory


Traceback:
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/hotness/use_cases/package_scratch_build_use_case.py", line 56, in build
    result = self.builder.build(request.package, request.opts)
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line 229, in build
    raise BuilderException(

If you think this issue is caused by some bug in the-new-hotness, please report it on the-new-hotness issue tracker: https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/issues

Created attachment 2059894 [details]
Update to 9.4.0 (#2171100)

Releases retrieved: 9.4.1
Upstream release that is considered latest: 9.4.1
Current version/release in rawhide: 9.2.6-21.fc42
URL: http://vtk.org/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/15084/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vtk

Scratch build failed. Details below:

BuilderException: Build failed:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-jg5lqj69/vtk.spec']' returned non-zero exit status 1.

StdOut:
warning: line 168: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires: hdf5 = %{_hdf5_version}
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1735344000
error: Bad file: ./VTKData-9.4.1.tar.gz: No such file or directory
error: Bad file: ./VTK-9.4.1.tar.gz: No such file or directory

RPM build warnings:
    line 168: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires: hdf5 = %{_hdf5_version}

RPM build errors:
    Bad file: ./VTKData-9.4.1.tar.gz: No such file or directory
    Bad file: ./VTK-9.4.1.tar.gz: No such file or directory


Traceback:
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/hotness/use_cases/package_scratch_build_use_case.py", line 56, in build
    result = self.builder.build(request.package, request.opts)
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line 229, in build
    raise BuilderException(

If you think this issue is caused by some bug in the-new-hotness, please report it on the-new-hotness issue tracker: https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/issues

Created attachment 2064012 [details]
Update to 9.4.1 (#2171100)

Releases retrieved: 9.4.2
Upstream release that is considered latest: 9.4.2
Current version/release in rawhide: 9.2.6-37.fc43
URL: http://vtk.org/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/15084/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vtk

Scratch build failed. Details below:

BuilderException: Build failed:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-ccz8ufg3/vtk.spec']' returned non-zero exit status 1.

StdOut:
warning: line 170: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires: hdf5 = %{_hdf5_version}
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1743379200
error: Bad file: ./VTKData-9.4.2.tar.gz: No such file or directory
error: Bad file: ./VTK-9.4.2.tar.gz: No such file or directory

RPM build warnings:
    line 170: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires: hdf5 = %{_hdf5_version}

RPM build errors:
    Bad file: ./VTKData-9.4.2.tar.gz: No such file or directory
    Bad file: ./VTK-9.4.2.tar.gz: No such file or directory


Traceback:
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/hotness/use_cases/package_scratch_build_use_case.py", line 56, in build
    result = self.builder.build(request.package, request.opts)
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line 229, in build
    raise BuilderException(

If you think this issue is caused by some bug in the-new-hotness, please report it on the-new-hotness issue tracker: https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/issues

Created attachment 2082841 [details]
Update to 9.4.2 (#2171100)

Releases retrieved: 9.5.0
Upstream release that is considered latest: 9.5.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 9.2.6-38.fc43
URL: http://vtk.org/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/15084/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vtk

Scratch build failed. Details below:

BuilderException: Build failed:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-mdjjgx34/vtk.spec']' returned non-zero exit status 1.

StdOut:
warning: line 170: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires: hdf5 = %{_hdf5_version}
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1750723200
error: Bad file: ./VTKData-9.5.0.tar.gz: No such file or directory
error: Bad file: ./VTK-9.5.0.tar.gz: No such file or directory

RPM build warnings:
    line 170: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires: hdf5 = %{_hdf5_version}

RPM build errors:
    Bad file: ./VTKData-9.5.0.tar.gz: No such file or directory
    Bad file: ./VTK-9.5.0.tar.gz: No such file or directory


Traceback:
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/hotness/use_cases/package_scratch_build_use_case.py", line 56, in build
    result = self.builder.build(request.package, request.opts)
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line 229, in build
    raise BuilderException(

If you think this issue is caused by some bug in the-new-hotness, please report it on the-new-hotness issue tracker: https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/issues

Created attachment 2094990 [details]
Update to 9.5.0 (#2171100)

FEDORA-2025-023e0dd108 (ALL-0.9.3-8.fc44, bout++-5.1.1-8.fc44, and 29 more) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 44.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-023e0dd108

FEDORA-2025-023e0dd108 (ALL-0.9.3-8.fc44, bout++-5.1.1-8.fc44, and 29 more) has been pushed to the Fedora 44 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.