Bug 2172129
| Summary: | Newly installed Satellite 6.13 shows broken symlink for .ansible.cfg inside /usr/share/foreman-proxy/ directory | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Sayan Das <saydas> |
| Component: | Ansible | Assignee: | satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Satellite QE Team <sat-qe-bz-list> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 6.13.0 | CC: | ahumbe, aruzicka, nalfassi, zuansorg |
| Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Release: | Unused | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Sayan Das
2023-02-21 14:57:14 UTC
Is there any user impact or broken workflows as a result of this behavior? (In reply to Brad Buckingham from comment #1) > Is there any user impact or broken workflows as a result of this behavior? Not at all as long as someone does not decide to put an ansible.cfg manually inside the target location, which then will cause issues. I am aware of a discussion here in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2171849#c2 about it as well. The question is how Ansible behaves if it finds a broken link. According to Ansible docs, it searches for ~/.ansible.cfg and if not found, then it goes for /etc/ansible/ansible.cfg. The ~/.ansible.cfg file is technically there, so is it possible that Ansible ignores /etc/ansible/ansible.cfg because it finds the broken link? IMHO, the test case used to verify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786358#c16 only tested that the modification in the cfg is persistent, not that it's applied during Ansible execution in Satellite. I'm asking about the broken link because of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2171849 Broken links are ignored, in 2171849 they don't have a broken link. |