Bug 217308

Summary: Man page bug for server-preference in dhcp6s.conf
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Reporter: Matthew Booth <mbooth>
Component: dhcpv6Assignee: David Cantrell <dcantrell>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.4   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2007-0266 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-05-01 23:26:02 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Matthew Booth 2006-11-26 22:18:07 UTC
Description of problem:
man dhcp6s.conf says:
       send server-preference <server preference value>;

Specifying 'send server-preference 10' in dhcp6s.conf causes an error. The
correct syntax is 'server-preference 10' (omit 'send'). The example
/usr/share/doc/dhcpv6-0.10/dhcp6s.conf is correct.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
dhcpv6-0.10-14_EL4

Comment 1 David Cantrell 2006-11-27 19:58:46 UTC
Fixed in dhcpv6-0.10-15_EL4 and rawhide.  Setting some flags to see what happens.

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2006-11-28 02:06:19 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux major release.  Product Management has requested further
review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux Major release.  This request is not yet committed for
inclusion.

Comment 3 James Laska 2006-12-14 14:36:46 UTC
This bug is filed against RHEL 4.4 ... but using RHEL5 flags.

Please use a separate bug for each product.

Comment 4 Ken Reilly 2006-12-14 23:23:59 UTC
I reset the rhel-5.0.0 flag to " " given this was reported against RHEL 4.4.
And, I changed the status to MODIFIED based on Comment #1. 

I'll leave it to the reporter and/or the maintainer to raise a separate bug for
rhel-5.0.0, if need be.  

Comment 5 David Cantrell 2006-12-15 16:36:26 UTC
OK, I confused myself with this bug.  When I saw it again, I forgot that it was
a RHEL4 bug and thought it was marked as "do something with it", so the problem
has been fixed in RHEL5.  My mistake.

Cloning for RHEL5 so we can track it.

Comment 11 Red Hat Bugzilla 2007-05-01 23:26:02 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0266.html