Bug 21731

Summary: Please add Czech mappings for kemaps
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Milan Kerslager <milan.kerslager>
Component: XconfiguratorAssignee: Preston Brown <pbrown>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.0CC: stano
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2001-01-06 12:33:12 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
This is the same patch as above but as attachment none

Description Milan Kerslager 2000-12-05 06:38:12 UTC 
There is a patch (simple cs keyboard don't work):

--- Xconfigurator-4.4.3/Xconfigurator.c.orig    Fri Aug 25 16:21:09 2000
+++ Xconfigurator-4.4.3/Xconfigurator.c Tue Dec  5 07:23:19 2000
@@ -809,7 +809,9 @@
   "hu101 -> hu", "it-ibm -> it", "it -> it", "it2 -> it", "is-latin1 ->
is",
   "is -> is", "no-latin1 -> no", "no -> no", "pl -> pl", "ru -> ru",
   "ru1 -> ru", "ru2 -> ru", "no -> no", "pl -> pl", "ru -> ru", "ru1 ->
ru",
-  "ru2 -> ru", "russian -> ru", "se-latin1 -> se", "uk -> gb", "jp106 ->
jp"
+  "ru2 -> ru", "russian -> ru", "se-latin1 -> se", "uk -> gb", "jp106 ->
jp",
+  "cz-lat2 -> czsk(us_cz_qwerty)", "cz-lat2-prog -> czsk(us_cz_prog)",
+  "cz-us-qwertz -> czsk(us_cz_qwertz)"
 };
 
 #ifdef __sparc__
Comment 1 Milan Kerslager 2000-12-05 06:39:42 UTC 
Created attachment 6033 [details]
This is the same patch as above but as attachment
Comment 2 stano 2001-01-06 12:33:09 UTC 
Milan: Isn't this misleading? - a czech keyboard should IMHO
have a czech mapping as the primary one, not the us one.

Please, get in touch with me before really applying this patch,
we should do the same thing for the slovak mappings too.
Comment 3 Preston Brown 2001-01-29 19:41:45 UTC 
I have not applied this pending further information.  Please re-open if you
believe it is still valid and have discussed it between each other.