Bug 2175151

Summary:	Issues in focus handling
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Alessio <alciregi>
Component:	mutter	Assignee:	Florian Müllner <fmuellner>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	38	CC:	fmuellner, gnome-sig, jadahl, otaylor, philip.wyett, robatino, walters
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-03-03 11:37:11 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2083910

Description Alessio 2023-03-03 11:18:37 UTC

Description of problem:

I don't know the component involved.
Btw I'm often facing this issue: dual screen setup, when I switch (i.e. via Alt-Tab) from a window (i.e. Google Chrome Flatpak, or a Java application) to another one (i.e. GNOME Terminal), the new window doesn't have the focus, and in the top bar the application name doesn't appear. To let the focus work again, I have to click on the previous window and back to the one I want to work on.

This also describes the issue
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-489f1e935f#comment-2920318


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

mutter-44~beta-2.fc38.x86_64

Comment 1 Fedora Blocker Bugs Application 2023-03-03 11:32:30 UTC

Proposed as a Blocker for 38-beta by Fedora user alciregi using the blocker tracking app because:

 Since I've faced this issue just after the installation and by just following my regular daily workflow (nothing special), I think that even if it doesn't infringe a specific criterion, the answer to a key question like "would this bug cause significant inconvenience or just a really bad first impression to a typical user or reviewer of the release?" is "yes".

Comment 2 Alessio 2023-03-03 11:37:11 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2173985 ***