Bug 2181656

Summary: RFE for the storage system role to support configuring the stripe size for RAID LVM volumes
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Reporter: David Lehman <dlehman>
Component: rhel-system-rolesAssignee: Vojtech Trefny <vtrefny>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fine Fan <ffan>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact: Apurva Bhide <abhide>
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 9.2CC: abhide, briasmit, csaba.daradics, cwei, ffan, rmeggins, spetrosi, storage-qe, vtrefny
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release: ---Flags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: role:storage
Fixed In Version: rhel-system-roles-1.22.0-0.9.el9 Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
.`storage` system role supports configuring the stripe size for RAID LVM volumes With this update, you can now specify a custom stripe size when creating RAID LVM devices. For better performance, use the custom stripe size for SAP HANA. The recommended stripe size for RAID LVM volumes is 64 KB.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 2141961 Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-11-07 08:29:39 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2168476    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 7 Fine Fan 2023-06-01 03:27:15 UTC
Hi ,
I've just checked the page https://github.com/linux-system-roles/storage/pull/357 ,  Yes there are a lot of testing from the gitlab pipeline.
I checked one of them  https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/linuxsystemroles/logs/lsr-citool_storage-357-a054634_RHEL-9.3.0-20230529.38_20230531-233755/artifacts/summary.html
There isn't a test about "raid_stripe_size" , maybe we could added it to pipeline later?

Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2023-11-07 08:29:39 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (rhel-system-roles bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2023:6390