Bug 2181787
| Summary: | boost_stacktrace_backtrace not provided | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Sandro <gui1ty> |
| Component: | boost | Assignee: | Thomas Rodgers <trodgers> |
| Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | denis.arnaud_fedora, jwakely, laurent.rineau__fedora, mcermak, trodgers |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-04-12 01:21:20 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Sandro
2023-03-25 23:34:06 UTC
Is there a reason why it has to link to *that* particular library? Fedora provides other backends for libboost_stacktrace, just not that one. Honestly, I don't know. It has been introduced in the latest release (3.0.7) in a commit titled "Add Meson/bt as alternative build and packaging system; make enum deserialisation more robust". I'm not a developer myself. If you could list the alternatives that are available by default in Fedora, I will ask upstream if they could switch to one of those. On the other hand, is there a reason for not making *this* particular library available? Does it conflict with other options? $ rpm -ql boost-stacktrace | grep /usr/lib64 /usr/lib64/libboost_stacktrace_addr2line.so.1.78.0 /usr/lib64/libboost_stacktrace_basic.so.1.78.0 /usr/lib64/libboost_stacktrace_noop.so.1.78.0 Fedora does not provide libbacktrace, so Boost can't build against it. Thanks. I forwarded that to upstream and they will be looking into a solution. |