Bug 218191

Summary:	graphviz-lua has incorrect description
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Michel Alexandre Salim <michel.salim>
Component:	graphviz	Assignee:	Jima <jima>
Status:	CLOSED CANTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	6	CC:	extras-qa
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-12-04 16:39:58 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Michel Alexandre Salim 2006-12-02 23:24:30 UTC

Description of problem:
graphviz-lua describes itself as a Java binding


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.8-5.fc6


How reproducible:
Always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -qi graphviz-lua
  
Actual results:
"Java extensions for graphviz."


Expected results:
Lua, not Java

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jima 2006-12-02 23:40:21 UTC

Hee.  Thanks for the bug report; it will be addressed shortly when I package up
recently-released 2.10.  Hopefully it'll be out within the week.

Comment 2 Jima 2006-12-08 20:16:56 UTC

Just an update on this: graphviz 2.12 is out, and I'm working on pushing it for
Extras.  Alas, there are a few minor issues that need to be hammered out,
including the potential for API breakage with dependent packages.

Comment 3 Jima 2007-12-04 16:39:58 UTC

Turns out the situation was a little more involved than I first realized, due to
graphviz's build dependencies.  As this bug is cosmetic only, and it's fixed in
every later Fedora release, I'm going to close this as CANTFIX.  Sorry. :-(

Thank you for bringing it to my attention; this bug is the reason it's fixed in
all later versions. :-)