Bug 2182454
| Summary: | rgw [5.3]: update functionality of rgw-restore-bucket-index and installation of tools | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | J. Eric Ivancich <ivancich> |
| Component: | RGW | Assignee: | J. Eric Ivancich <ivancich> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Vidushi Mishra <vimishra> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | Akash Raj <akraj> |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 5.3 | CC: | akraj, ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, kdreyer, tserlin, vereddy |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 5.3z2 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: |
.Administrators can now reuse output from `rados ls` to complete bucket reindexing quickly
Previously, running `rados ls` command for each bucket was very time-consuming and therefore, slowed down the reindexing of buckets.
With this enhancement, the `rgw-restore-bucket-index` tool is enhanced to allow it to reuse a pre-existing output of a `rados ls` command, thereby allowing administrators to reuse the output from one `rados ls` command. This allows bucket index recovery of multiple non-versioned buckets to be completed more quickly.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-04-11 20:07:59 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 2185621 | ||
|
Comment 3
Ken Dreyer (Red Hat)
2023-03-31 15:24:36 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.3 Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:1732 |