Bug 2182696
Summary: | msgfmt --java2 option doesn't work with java-17-openjdk | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | Reporter: | Nikos Moumoulidis <nmoumoul> |
Component: | gettext | Assignee: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Sanket Saikia <ssaikia> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 9.1 | CC: | bbarve, eng-i18n-bugs, jjanco, loganjerry, mtasaka, nphilipp, petersen, praiskup |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Triaged |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | gettext-0.21-8.el9 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | 2062407 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2023-11-07 08:53:08 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 2062407 | ||
Bug Blocks: | |||
Deadline: | 2023-04-17 |
Description
Nikos Moumoulidis
2023-03-29 12:00:00 UTC
I think this would require rebasing gettext to 0.21.1 Actually thinking more we probably don't have to rebase just for this: the patch should work/build in RHEL 9. I guess only remaining concern is if this could break any other packages/uses of old Java? (In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #15) > I guess only remaining concern is if this could break any other > packages/uses of old Java? Actually I think the patch is supposed to handle both Java 11 and 17, so it should be okay though the patch is not upstream yet. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (gettext bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:6629 |