Bug 2183980

Summary:	Content Management support missing aarch64 with RHEL 9
Product:	Red Hat Satellite	Reporter:	Direct Docs Feedback <ddf-bot>
Component:	Hosts - Content	Assignee:	satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status:	NEW ---	QA Contact:	Satellite QE Team <sat-qe-bz-list>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.12.0	CC:	bangelic, lserot, lstejska, zuansorg
Target Milestone:	Unspecified	Keywords:	Documentation, Triaged
Target Release:	Unused	Flags:	mdolezel: needinfo? (bangelic)
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Direct Docs Feedback 2023-04-03 10:25:38 UTC

Hello 
aarch64 (arm) is missing here. 
This paragraph let people think managed RHEL server can't be running on ARM; But: 
- We sell skus "RHEL for ARM with Smart Management" 
- the doc about Satellite  overview, state that for Content Management at least, RHEL 9 w/ aarch64 is supported https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_satellite/6.12/html/satellite_overview_concepts_and_deployment_considerations/introduction_to_server_planning#sect-Architecture_Supported_Client_Architectures 

So maybe a new bullet point could be relevant here, but stating "with restricted scope"  

Reported by: rh-sa-lserot

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_satellite/6.12/html/managing_hosts/registering_hosts_to_server_managing-hosts#annotations:f60f93f5-8ff8-4937-982b-06185f4fdfcf

Comment 2 Marie Hornickova 2023-04-03 11:53:48 UTC

Hello,

Thank you very much for pointing out this potential gap in documentation.

The BZ will go through regular team triage.

Once the work starts, important updates about the implementation will be shared here.

Thank you!