Bug 2184605

Summary: [ODF 4.13][Fusion-aaS] OpenShift Data Foundation Client operator is listed in OperatorHub and installable from UI
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation Reporter: Jilju Joy <jijoy>
Component: ocs-client-operatorAssignee: Nobody <nobody>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Jilju Joy <jijoy>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 4.13CC: fbalak, muagarwa, nberry, ocs-bugs, odf-bz-bot, omitrani
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ODF 4.13.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 2187764 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-06-21 15:25:02 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2187764    

Description Jilju Joy 2023-04-05 07:41:32 UTC
Description of problem (please be detailed as possible and provide log
snippests):
OpenShift Data Foundation Client operator is listed in OperatorHub and installable from UI. This need not be enabled in UI.

Version of all relevant components (if applicable):
OCP 4.12.9
$ oc get csv
NAME                                               DISPLAY                            VERSION             REPLACES                                           PHASE
configure-alertmanager-operator.v0.1.518-ec4c3cd   configure-alertmanager-operator    0.1.518-ec4c3cd     configure-alertmanager-operator.v0.1.516-bdea4ea   Succeeded
observability-operator.v0.0.20                     Observability Operator             0.0.20              observability-operator.v0.0.19                     Succeeded
ocs-client-operator.v4.13.0-124.stable             OpenShift Data Foundation Client   4.13.0-124.stable                                                      Succeeded
odf-csi-addons-operator.v4.13.0-124.stable         CSI Addons                         4.13.0-124.stable                                                      Succeeded
route-monitor-operator.v0.1.493-a866e7c            Route Monitor Operator             0.1.493-a866e7c     route-monitor-operator.v0.1.489-7d9fe90            Succeeded

==========================================================================
Does this issue impact your ability to continue to work with the product
(please explain in detail what is the user impact)?
User might choose to install the operator which is not recommented. The installation should not be enabled from UI.

Is there any workaround available to the best of your knowledge?
No

Rate from 1 - 5 the complexity of the scenario you performed that caused this
bug (1 - very simple, 5 - very complex)?
1

Can this issue reproducible?
Yes, always

Can this issue reproduce from the UI?
UI issue.

If this is a regression, please provide more details to justify this:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create Catalogsource for ODF 4.13.0
2. Try to install OpenShift Data Foundation Client operator from OperatorHub in UI


Actual results:
Installation of OpenShift Data Foundation Client operator is possible from UI

Expected results:
OpenShift Data Foundation Client operator should not be installable from UI


Additional info:
Didn't select component because a bug component for ocs-client-operator is not present.

Comment 4 Madhu Rajanna 2023-04-05 08:34:10 UTC
https://github.com/red-hat-storage/ocs-client-operator/pull/28 posted the PR

Comment 7 Mudit Agarwal 2023-04-25 03:16:18 UTC
Madhu, does it require a backport to 4.13 branch?

Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2023-06-21 15:25:02 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.13.0 enhancement and bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:3742