Bug 2185191
Summary: | [4.11.z]Fix storagecluster watch request for OCSInitialization | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation | Reporter: | Nitin Goyal <nigoyal> |
Component: | ocs-operator | Assignee: | Nitin Goyal <nigoyal> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Aviad Polak <apolak> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 4.11 | CC: | ebenahar, kramdoss, ocs-bugs, odf-bz-bot |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | ODF 4.11.8 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | 2185188 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2023-05-24 11:39:49 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 2185188 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Nitin Goyal
2023-04-07 11:43:34 UTC
Verifications Steps: We should not see a request for a storagecluster reconciliation named ocsinit as shown in the above logs of ocs-operator. A backport is necessary because a regression was introduced while fixing other bugs. This regression causes the storage cluster reconcile process to requeue the OCS initialization resource as a storage cluster resource. However, the reconciler complains that the resource does not exist, which results in the reconcile process being skipped whenever there is an update in the configmap. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.11.8 Bug Fix Update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:3293 |