Bug 2185588
Summary: | [CEE/sd][Ceph-volume] wrong block_db_size computed when adding OSD | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Tridibesh Chakraborty <trchakra> | |
Component: | Ceph-Volume | Assignee: | Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux> | |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Manisha Saini <msaini> | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | Akash Raj <akraj> | |
Priority: | unspecified | |||
Version: | 5.3 | CC: | akraj, bkunal, ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, gabrioux, gjose, msaini, stockage-dnum, tserlin, vereddy | |
Target Milestone: | --- | |||
Target Release: | 6.1 | |||
Hardware: | All | |||
OS: | Linux | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | ceph-17.2.6-20.el9cp | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: |
.The correct size is calculated for each database device in `ceph-volume`
Previously, as of RHCS 4.3, `ceph-volume` would not make a single VG with all database devices inside, since each database device had its own VG. Due to this, the database size was calculated differently for each LV.
With this release, the logic is updated to take into account the new database devices with LVM layout. The correct size is calculated for each database device.
|
Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 2186515 2186787 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2023-06-15 09:17:19 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | ||||
Bug Blocks: | 2186515, 2186787, 2192813 |
Description
Tridibesh Chakraborty
2023-04-10 12:14:50 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage 6.1 security and bug fix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:3623 |