Bug 2185653
| Summary: | routine rebase of libpfm for rhel 8.9 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | William Cohen <wcohen> |
| Component: | libpfm | Assignee: | William Cohen <wcohen> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Lenka Špačková <lkuprova> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | Jacob Taylor Valdez <jvaldez> |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 8.9 | CC: | jvaldez, mkolar, mpetlan, phybl |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Rebase, Triaged |
| Target Release: | --- | Flags: | pm-rhel:
mirror+
|
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | libpfm-4.13.0-1.el8 | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
| Doc Text: |
.`libpfm` rebased to version 4.13
The `libpfm` package has been updated to version 4.13. With this update, `libpfm` can now access performance monitoring hardware native events for the following processor microarchitectures:
* AMD Zen 4
* ARM Neoverse N1
* ARM Neoverse N2
* ARM Neoverse V1
* ARM Neoverse V2
* 4th Generation Intel® Xeon® Scalable Processors
* IBM z16
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-11-14 15:34:27 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 2047725, 2109907, 2111966, 2111973, 2111981, 2111987 | ||
|
Description
William Cohen
2023-04-10 18:38:30 UTC
Hi Will! After looking at this in conjunction with the hardware enablement bugs i've seen for libpfm, what would you think about consolidating all of those hardware enablement mentions here in this rebase release note instead of having 5+ individual hardware enablement release notes for libpfm? Cheers It is a fine idea to consolidate the individual hardware enablement bugs into the rebase bug. That crossed my mind when I was entering the info for the individual HW enablement bugs doc text. Have a little blurb in doc text listing the microarchitectures supported. Feel free to tweak it to match the standards. Intel will probably also want sapphire rapids changed to whatever the marketing name is. The docs look fine to me. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (libpfm bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:6996 |