Bug 2186544
| Summary: | why can't dnf output errors? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Harald Reindl <h.reindl> |
| Component: | dnf5 | Assignee: | rpm-software-management |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 37 | CC: | daniel.mach, jkolarik, jmracek, jrohel, mblaha, nsella, packaging-team-maint, pkratoch, rpm-software-management, vmukhame |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Harald Reindl
2023-04-13 16:42:24 UTC
We will try to resolve the problem in DNF5. The problem with reports is that time to time libsolv (our solver) returns messages that are confusing but technically correct. DNF is going to be replaced by DNF5 (fedora 39) therefore it would be better to fix it in DNF5 > The problem with reports is that time to time libsolv (our solver)
> returns messages that are confusing but technically correct
no matter how confusing a message is - it's more helpful as "don't work"
what problem do you think to solve by hide them?
if i don't understand them i can google
if i don't have them i can't do anything
the "confusing" messages at depsolv 15 years ago teached me to learn how rpm dependencies are woriking and where useful to avoid useless deps when you can abort because you decide to completly remove the package pulling a whole chain of libs
|