Bug 2186729

Summary:	[DDF] Why are we referring to RHCS-2 and RHCS-3 in the RHCS-6 docs? didn't they both go EOL a long time ago ?
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	Direct Docs Feedback <ddf-bot>
Component:	Documentation	Assignee:	Akash Raj <akraj>
Documentation sub component:	DDF	QA Contact:	Manisha Saini <msaini>
Status:	RELEASE_PENDING ---	Docs Contact:
Severity:	urgent
Priority:	unspecified	CC:	bmclaren, rmandyam, vdas
Version:	6.0	Keywords:	NoDocsQEReview
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	Backlog
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Direct Docs Feedback 2023-04-14 09:28:11 UTC

Why are we referring to RHCS-2 and RHCS-3 in the RHCS-6 docs? didn't they both go EOL a long time ago ?

Reported by: rh-ee-hemoller

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_ceph_storage/6/html/object_gateway_guide/considerations-and-recommendations#annotations:283dd9fb-1d11-41ab-a723-08a57d79ba4d

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2023-04-14 09:28:21 UTC

Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity.